Connect with us

Acceleration

Editors Choice: What Does A Robe Mean to A Judge In Texas – in Particular Where There IS Fraud On the Court?

Unbeknownst to many, federal courts have the power under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to set aside judgments entered years earlier that were obtained by “fraud on the court.”

Published

on

FRAUD ON THE COURT AND ABUSIVE DISCOVERY

Unbeknownst to many, federal courts have the power under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to set aside judgments entered years earlier that were obtained by “fraud on the court.”

Fraud on the court, however, can take many forms and courts and commentators agree that it is a nebulous concept. The power to set aside a judgment requires courts to strike a balance between the principles of justice and finality.

A majority of courts require a showing, by clear and convincing evidence, of intentional fraudulent conduct specifically directed at the court itself. This standard is flawed.

And courts that have adopted it are abdicating their solemn responsibility as the gatekeeper to justice because innocent victims seeking to set aside judgments obtained by abusive discovery find themselves as a square-peg trying to fit into a round hole.

The remedial and equitable nature of the fraud-on-the-court doctrine and the great public policy that it embodies militates against making that burden an impossible hurdle for victims of abusive discovery.

This Article suggests that courts depart from the heightened standard used to set aside judgments, particularly judgments obtained by abusive discovery. Specifically, this Article advances a four-step process to resolve the ultimate inquiry: whether the abusive conduct caused the court not to perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases.

Under this standard, courts will more readily find that abusive discovery that undermines the integrity of the judicial process or influences the decision of the court constitutes a fraud on the court.

David R. Hague*

Hague, David R. (2016) “Fraud on the Court and Abusive Discovery,” Nevada Law Journal: Vol. 16 : Iss. 2 , Article 9.
Available at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/nlj/vol16/iss2/9

Palm Beach Gardens homeowner gets $18 million in foreclosure settlement

by Kim Miller 

Palm Beach Gardens homeowner and foreclosure fighter Lynn Szymoniak is slated to get $18 million from the nationwide settlement with the country’s five largest banks that was filed in federal court Monday.

Szymoniak, who was featured on the CBS news show 60 Minutes last year for the work she did uncovering the robo-signing scandal, said this morning that her gain from the settlement seems “surreal.”

“I always tend to discount everything until it’s signed,” she said. “I knew it was part of the settlement in February, but not how much.”

Szymoniak’s settlement is part of a larger $95 million agreement reached with the banks and Bill Nettles, the U.S. District Attorney of South Carolina. That agreement is written into the $25 billion nationwide settlement between 40 state attorneys general and Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Ally Financial, Wells Fargo and Citigroup.

South Carolina began investigating allegations in the spring of 2010 that banks were involved in a nationwide practice of failing to obtain required mortgage assignments.

The lack of appropriate assignments resulted in servicing misconduct and using false assignments to submit federal housing administration mortgage insurance claims, according to a press release.

The False Claims Act allows the government to bring actions against groups that knowingly use false documents to obtain government money or to conceal an obligation to pay money.

The lawsuit was initially filed by Szymnoniak under a whistleblower provision in the False Claims Act.

Under the act, the whistleblower is entitled to a share of the government’s recovery.

“By this agreement we are making an important first step to hold mortgage servicers accountable for fraudulent and abusive practices, not only in South Carolina but nationwide,” said Nettles.

“It also demonstrates the role that whistleblowers can play in working with the government to return dollars to the federal treasury and to expose wrongdoing.”

Florida’s struggling homeowners are one step closer to getting a share of the state’s foreclosure settlement – valued at $8.4 billion – after formal bank agreements were filed in federal court Monday.

The agreements with the nation’s five largest lenders are the culmination of a nationwide attorneys general investigation that began in the fall of 2010 with allegations that forged documents were used to repossess people’s homes.

Included in the settlement are JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Bank of America and Ally Financial.

The agreements, which outline strict new standards for handling mortgages, still need a judge’s approval. But Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi said the filing in the U.S. district court in Washington is a significant accomplishment.

The landmark agreement, considered the largest federal/state civil settlement ever obtained, was announced Feb. 14.

“Today’s filings pave the way for court orders that will provide substantial relief to Florida’s homeowners, hold banks accountable and reform the mortgage servicing industry,” Bondi said.

South Florida foreclosure defense attorneys were able to do only a cursory review of the hundreds of pages filed in court Monday, but at least two lawyers found positives for homeowners.

Royal Palm Beach foreclosure defense attorney Tom Ice, whose firm was instrumental in discovering the robo-signing issues that ultimately led to the nationwide investigation, said there are now higher standards for banks to complete a foreclosure.

“The requirements for providing documentation of loan ownership and good-faith verification to foreclose will undoubtedly make robo-signing more difficult,” Ice said.

“And in some cases, where the necessary documents and information is missing, it may create an insurmountable problem for the bank to foreclose quickly, or foreclose at all.”

Though the details of the settlements were not available until Monday’s court filings, critics have derided the agreements for releasing banks from state-sought civil and administrative claims, including claims for damages, fines, remedies and sanctions in relation to foreclosure wrongdoing.

But several other claims are not exempt from prosecution, according to Monday’s agreements. Those include criminal complaints, as well as claims against securities and securitization; claims against the Mortgage Electronic Registration System, or MERS; and claims of county or city records clerks.

Individual homeowners are still clear to file lawsuits against their lenders and generally will not be asked to waive that right if they receive aid from the settlement.

“I was most concerned that there would be some sneak releases for things that we think the banks should be held liable for,” said Roy Oppenheim of Oppenheim Law in Weston. “But they are not being released from suits against MERS or securitization.”

Oppenheim also noted that foreclosure processing companies, such as the now closed DocX, were not given “get-out-of-jail passes.”

Nationally, the $25 billion deal with the banks could provide up to $40 billion in cash, refinances and principal write-downs to homeowners.

Florida negotiated a special guarantee with Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America ensuring at least $4 billion will be awarded in the form of principal reductions, loan modifications and refinances for underwater borrowers.

Florida’s haul includes a $334 million payment to the state, 10 percent of which is considered a penalty. The attorney general has discretion on how to use the remainder, but it generally must go to foreclosure-rescue programs or fraud investigations.

About $171 million will be cash payments to Florida borrowers who lost homes to foreclosure between 2008 and 2011 and were victims of servicer abuse. An additional $309 million will refinance underwater borrowers current on their loans.

Ice said he is concerned about the enforcement provisions in the settlements, which he described as an “agreement to agree.”

“We don’t want this to go the way of the Florida Supreme Court’s requirement that banks verify their pleadings,” Ice said. “All that accomplished was that the banks began robo-verifying the complaints.”

 — Somewhere, presumably Georgia, lives a woman named Linda Green. According to investigators, her signature – and variations of it – appears on hundreds of thousands of questionable mortgage documents.

Linda Green has an impressive résumé. She has been a vice president of at least 14 banks and mortgage companies, including Wells Fargo and Bank of America. The documents with her signature are called mortgage assignments. By signing, she attests to the true owner of a mortgage, which proves that a bank has the right to foreclose on a home.

One of those homes belongs to Lynn Szymoniak, a Palm Beach Gardens lawyer who specializes in white-collar crime. Szymoniak, 61, has ferreted out economic crimes for years and federal prosecutors have called her as an expert witness in four trials. In July 2008, after negotiations with her lender over an increase to her ­adjustable-rate mortgage failed, she received foreclosure papers on her home.

What she saw “made no sense.” The company servicing her mortgage was in Dallas. Linda Green was in Alpharetta, Ga. S zymoniak launched an investigation of her own foreclosure.

“I did what I often do in cases,” Szymoniak said. “I find other documents that have been signed by the same person.” What she saw at the Palm Beach County Courthouse made her suspicious. She expanded her investigation of Linda Green to other counties: “Then I hit the mother lode .”

Linda Green’s signature varied widely in thousands of documents Szymoniak found. Szymoniak had uncovered the practice of robo-signing: employees at banks and mortgage servicing companies who sign sworn affidavits without any knowledge of the case. Linda Green is believed to be among the most common robo-signatures of them all.

“I have had training in this, but you don’t need training,” Szymoniak said. “It’s obvious to anyone that many people are signing for Linda Green.”

Lender Process Services Inc. confirmed that Green worked for its defunct subsidiary, Docx LLC, and does not now work for LPS. The Florida Attorney General’s Office is investigating LPS in connection with documents that “appear to be forged, incorrectly and illegally executed and false and misleading.”

Often, as in Szymoniak’s case, Green’s mortgage assignment was dated months after the case was filed, bringing into question the true owner of the note when the foreclosure proceedings began. Another document in her case was a copy of what appeared to be the top of her mortgage pasted to the bottom of another document.

As Szymoniak sees it, she has been the victim of at least four foreclosure schemes: Robo-signing. Forgery. Bogus documents. Fraud.

Szymoniak believes legions of distressed home­owners are being victimized by other methods that are tough to uncover and even tougher to avoid.

Indeed, 43,428 homes in Palm Beach County were in some stage of foreclosure last year, according to RealtyTrac.

“I wasn’t surprised,” former Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum said about the breadth, quantity and ingenuity of foreclosure fraud reported throughout the state. Since 2008, the Florida Attorney General’s Office has launched more than 150 mortgage fraud investigations. Seventy remain open, and more than 50 companies are still under review

The bulk of the attorney general’s ongoing investigations involve consultants and companies that collect upfront fees to assist with loan modifications. Upfront fees are illegal. Fees may be collected only after services are completed.

“It’s been clear for some time that there are people out there who are very creative,” McCollum said. “These people were associated with the industry in good times, and they know how to make money in this.”

Another explanation for the magnitude of the fraud is that some participants – the robo-signers and notaries – may not even be aware they are participating, said William Kovacic, who serves on the Federal Trade Commission and has studied the psychology of white-collar criminals.

“If the true nature were revealed in an unvarnished way, a number of people would refuse to participate,” Kovacic said.

“Part of the effort of the people who orchestrate these frauds is to assure the subordinates that what is taking place is legitimate.”

Even when they learn of the scheme, they are so far removed from the victim that they feel little remorse or responsibility, Kovacic said

‘Huge’ Number of Lawyers Accused In Civil and Criminal Mortgage-Related Fraud Cases

Originally Published 20 Sept, 2012 | Republished by LIT; 27 Feb, 2020

There is a disturbing trend among the proliferation of mortgage-fraud prosecutions and civil cases that followed the meltdown of the real estate market in recent years.

Many of the defendants are lawyers, reports the Wall Street Journal (sub. req.).

Joseph Dunn, who serves as executive director of the State Bar of California, calls the involvement of lawyers in perpetrating mortgage-related scams a “huge” problem.

Since 2009, the group has gotten over 11,000 mortgage-related complaints about attorneys. Over 100 California lawyers have been disciplined and another 200 or so are either facing legal ethics charges or being investigated.

Senior counsel Yolanda McGill of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, in Washington, D.C., says a national database of 25,000 complaints about suspected mortgage-related fraud includes more than 6,000 complaints against attorneys and law firms.

An attorney is a key participant in a mortgage scheme, says Craig Howland, chief of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s financial institutions fraud unit.

That’s because being able to point to a lawyer, who is sworn to uphold the law, “adds legitimacy” to the scam and thus can help ensnare potential victims.

Howland says there are a number of pending FBI probes concerning lawyers.

As previous ABAJournal.com posts detail, numerous fairly low-profile lawyers who closed real estate transactions involving mortgage fraud have already been held criminally accountable. That apparently may be due, at least in part, to the relative ease of proving mortgage-related fraud through inaccurate closing documents for real estate sales and misstatements made about the disbursements of funds at closing.

Meanwhile, as many observers have commented in news reports, high-level defendants in major cases involving the mortgage meltdown are few and far between, despite widespread real estate-related fraud and an explosion of so-called robo-signing of mortgage foreclosure documents filed by plaintiff lenders in recent years.

A number of attorneys also have been held accountable, through attorney disciplinary cases and civil suits, for operating foreclosure-rescue businesses that reportedly obtain hefty up-front payments from owners trying to save their homes, but offer little in return.

Current and former lawyers who made headlines over criminal charges, convictions and/or sentences within the past year include two who got prison terms of six and nine years in federal court in Chicago this summer; a New York attorney who operated a title company and was criminally convicted and disbarred over his role in a real estate developer’s $92 million mortgage fraud (a New York real estate closing attorney also lost his law license over the same developer’s fraud, although the lawyer apparently didn’t have any knowledge of the scheme); and a Connecticut lawyer who is also a rabbi who took a plea in a false-statement case for incorrectly reporting how funds would be disbursed at closing, in a case related to a disbarred attorney’s more extensive mortgage fraud. Two more New York closing attorneys were convicted at trial in July, but say they did nothing wrong and plan to appeal.

A New Jersey lawyer earlier this month got seven years and was ordered to cough up nearly $200,000 in a case in which his counsel says he was paid only his legal fee. And two Florida attorneys who worked for a law firm that closed condominium sales took a plea in a straw-buyer case and could get as much as five years when they are sentenced.

A Florida closing lawyer nearing retirement age who took a plea in a mortgage-related money-laundering conspiracy case told the ABAJournal last year that she hoped to avoid prison due to her extensive cooperation with federal authorities and efforts to combat mortgage fraud.

“I’ve tried to do the right thing. … I have cooperated with them, and I regret the decisions, and I wish that I had never stepped into this area,” she said. “But it did. It happened. Unfortunately.”

A federal judge reduced her sentence substantially from the six-and-a-half years that guidelines suggested. But she still got over two years.

“In my judgment, when you commit a multi-million-dollar fraud even in an otherwise law-abiding life, you can’t just say ‘I’m sorry’ and everything is forgiven,” the judge said.

Criminal Defense Lawyer Gets 6 Years, Real Estate Attorney Gets 9 in Federal Mortgage Fraud Case

July 12, 2012

Updated: On Tuesday, longtime criminal defense attorney Charles Murphy gave up his Illinois law license.

Before the end of the week he was sitting stone-faced in a federal courtroom in Chicago full of his supporters, awaiting sentence in a $9.2 million mortgage-fraud case.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Guzman gave the 65-year-old ex-attorney six years. Prosecutors had sought more than double that amount, contending that Murphy was a key figure in a flipping scheme. It involved the sale of 40 homes in low-income South Side neighborhoods at inflated prices between 2002 and 2006, often to so-called straw buyers who weren’t qualified or willing to actually make the loan payments, according to the Chicago Tribune:

Lawyer sentenced to 6 years in mortgage fraud

The sentencing of Charles Murphy started with a question that might have been on the minds of anyone who has followed the career of the veteran Chicago criminal defense attorney.

“I wonder what the heck Mr. Murphy is doing here?” Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Netols said as the defendant awaited his fate on federal wire and mail fraud convictions for financing fraudulent real estate transactions.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Guzman sentenced Murphy to six years in prison, less than half the maximum sought by prosecutors.

Prosecutors said Murphy played an integral role in the $9.2 million scheme, in which about 40 residences in economically depressed areas on the South Side were bought and then resold at fraudulently inflated prices from 2002 to 2006. Four others also were convicted in the scheme, which relied on straw purchasers.

Murphy, 65, sat stone-faced in a federal courtroom packed with colleagues, friends and family, who had gathered to support him.

For years he was a familiar face at the Cook County Criminal Court Building at 26th Street and California Avenue, where he worked as a public defender before entering private practice.

After Netols asked why Murphy got himself involved in the fraud scheme, he answered the question in a word himself: greed. Netols also took issue with how the scheme targeted an already beleaguered community.

“He didn’t choose to flip houses in his Mount Greenwood neighborhood,” the prosecutor said. “He went over to Englewood. … As an experienced criminal defense attorney, he had all the evidence at the first transaction that he committed fraud. And he went for it.”

Murphy’s lawyer, Susan Shatz, spoke of his military record — he volunteered for the Marines during the Vietnam War — as well as his age and diagnosis of prostate cancer.

She also mentioned the numerous letters, including several from Cook County judges, that sought leniency.

“I would like to add my voice to the letters,” Shatz said. “I clerked for him myself. Mr. Murphy is a great mentor. He is a great friend. He helped many people, including me.”

Shatz contended that Murphy was duped by one of his co-defendants. She portrayed Robert Brunt, who was sentenced to 12 1/2 years this week for his role, as a slippery character who came to Murphy seeking a loan for his business and then drew him into the crooked scheme.

“Anybody can be conned by a con man,” she said.

In court papers, prosecutors argued that Murphy was the more sophisticated of the two, noting Brunt’s limited education.

Murphy addressed the judge briefly. Like the attorney he was until Tuesday, when he surrendered his law license, Murphy first asked to correct the record — Shatz had misstated the titles of his military medals. Murphy then thanked his wife.

“Whatever the outcome, I do understand I am fortunate in one regard — the support of my wife of 45 years,” he said. “Thank you, Patricia.”

Guzman said he considered Murphy’s age one of the “heaviest factors” weighing in favor of a shorter sentence. The judge seemed moved by Murphy’s military record as well.

“Clearly that has to count for something,” he said.

But Guzman pointed out the local and national impact of mortgage fraud schemes, particularly those that divert money set aside to help people with lower incomes purchase a home, as in this case.

In the end, Guzman was left questioning how Murphy joined in the fraud scheme after so many years in the criminal justice field.

“He had an education, a profession. He had a career. He earned a substantial income,” the judge said. “One must be left wondering how he found his way here.”

Another attorney who is a co-defendant in the case, 50-year-old John Farano, was sentenced to nine years on Wednesday:

Palos Park lawyer sentenced for mortgage fraud

A Palos Park attorney has been sentenced to nine years in prison and ordered to pay more than $1.3 million in restitution following his conviction last year for taking part in a multimillion-dollar mortgage fraud scheme, the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago said Thursday.

John Farano, whose law license has been suspended, was also ordered to forfeit more than $2.3 million, according to a news release from the U.S. attorney’s office.

Farano, 50, and three other people were convicted of multiple counts of mail and wire fraud last December following a nine-week trial. The four netted about $5.45 million in fraudulently obtained mortgage loans, and the scheme involved paying kickbacks to a nonprofit organization to obtain some of the properties at a discount from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. attorney’s office said.

The scheme involved at least 40 residential properties, primarily located in Chicago’s Englewood community, according to the news release.

Farano and another attorney, Charles Murphy, of Chicago, put up money to buy residences knowing they’d earn a profit from the fraudulently obtained mortgages, the U.S. attorney said.

Farano, who was sentenced Wednesday, was convicted of four counts of mail and wire fraud and five counts of theft of government funds, and is scheduled to begin serving his sentence Sept. 10, the U.S. attorney said.

During the trial, federal prosecutors said the scheme involved buying homes that needed extensive repairs and which were located in economically-depressed neighborhoods. Homes were bought using straw buyers and properties were resold at grossly inflated prices, often with little actual repair work being done on the homes, the government said.

Others sentenced Wednesday were Robert Brunt, of Chicago, who was president of Genesis Investment Group, and Tracey Scullark, of Chicago, a sales agent for Genesis. Brunt was sentenced to 121/2 years in prison and Scullark received 61/2 years. They were ordered to pay more than $1.6 million in restitution and forfeit $4.2 million in proceeds.

Farano — whose firm concentrates in criminal defense, personal injury and real estate — handled real estate closings in the fraudulent deals for Genesis, the government said. The lawyer also operated Big Dog Holdings, BD Financial Group and Capital Acquisitions, which provided the upfront money to buy the distressed properties, the government said.

An earlier Chicago Tribune article published when Murphy and Farano were convicted by a federal jury in December of five counts of mail and wire fraud explains the claimed scheme:

Lawyer found guilty in home mortgage fraud scheme

A federal jury convicted a veteran Chicago criminal-defense lawyer Thursday of taking part in a $9 million mortgage fraud scheme that took advantage of unqualified home buyers in economically depressed neighborhoods in the city.

Charles Murphy, 65, was convicted of five counts of mail and wire fraud in U.S. District Judge Ronald Guzman’s courtroom in the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago.

Murphy and three others allegedly acquired at least 40 residences — often homes in need of extensive repairs — and quickly resold them at inflated prices.

Murphy, an attorney since 1974, and John Farano, 49, a lawyer from Palos Park, allegedly had financed the purchases. Robert Brunt, 45, and Tracey Scullark, 43, both of Chicago, allegedly recruited unqualified buyers by enticing them with false sales offers and promises of prompt repairs and renovations, according to court documents.

Prosecutors alleged that Murphy and others urged buyers to sign closing documents they had never seen and falsely inflated the amount of money posted by buyers for down payments, making it more likely lenders would approve loans.

The scheme allegedly took place from 2002 to 2006 and defrauded banks, mortgage lenders and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Farano, Brunt and Scullark were each convicted Thursday of multiple counts, while another defendant, Douglas Blanchard, was acquitted on the lone mail fraud count he faced.

Two others, Walter Jackson, 38, and Armani D’Aifallah, 40, both of Chicago, pleaded guilty in 2009 and testified for the prosecution at the trial, according to the U.S. attorney’s office.

Prosecutors are seeking forfeiture of at least $4.2 million from those convicted in the scheme.

Prosecutors said co-defendants worked together to sell homes purchased by Murphy and Farano to unqualified buyers. Lenders were then persuaded to grant mortgages based on loan paperwork that contained false information, such as inflated down payment amounts. The homes often needed work, and buyers were promised renovations that didn’t occur, according to court documents. Farano served as a closing attorney on some of the fraudulent deals.

Meanwhile, buyers were persuaded to sign on in order to get no-money-down or cash-back-at-closing deals, explains a press release (PDF) from the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois. It notes that Farano was found guilty of four counts of mail and wire fraud and five counts of theft of government funds, but acquitted on three mail and wire fraud counts.

The Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission website shows that Farano’s law license was suspended on an interim basis pending further proceedings, on June 26.

A New York title attorney who is awaiting sentencing for his role in a Long Island real estate developer’s $92 million mortgage origination fraud in Nassau County was disbarred last week.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. is suing Ted Doumazios along with a closing attorney allegedly involved with him in arranging $1.2 million of the fraudulent loans attributed to convicted developer Thomas Kontogiannis, according to Courthouse News Service:

New FDIC Suit Looks for a Piece of the $92M Mortgage Fraud Pie

(CN) – The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. has set its sights on four co-conspirators alleged to have played a relatively small role in the $92 million mortgage fraud that took out Washington Mutual Bank, filing a federal complaint that seeks to recover $1.2 million.

“The concerted action of all the participants in the scheme, including defendants, caused substantial losses to WaMu, which purchased the mortgages in justified reliance on the false representations and documentation created by defendants and other participants in the scheme,” the FDIC claims in Brooklyn, N.Y.

It says the schemers helped fraudulent mortgage sellers create bogus loans that were sold to WaMu and others for millions of dollars, without conveying, recording or insuring the property titles.
Named as defendants are United General Title Insurance, Clear View Abstract, its owner Ted Doumazios and New York attorney Thomas Cusack III.

The FDIC, which took over Washington Mutual after its collapse in September 2008, says the defendants conspired with other entities that made mortgage payments to WaMu to create the illusion of legitimate mortgage loans and conceal the fraud.

Doumazios’ $1.2 million scam represents a fraction of the massive $92 million fraud engineered by Long Island real estate developer Thomas Kontogiannis.

Both men pleaded guilty last year following their 2009 indictment along with seven others. Kontogiannis, who is not named as a defendant in the FDIC’s present action, controlled several entities that staged sales of properties in Brooklyn and Queens by recruiting straw buyers from among family members and employees.

“As part of the scheme, members of the Kontogiannis family acted with others, including the defendants named herein, using the artifice of separate and independent entities, to create fraudulent mortgage loans with seemingly appropriate documentation, to sell those fraudulent ‘mortgages’ to WaMu and others for millions of dollars, to retain the proceeds of the sale that supposedly were to be distributed to fictitious mortgagors and purchasers, and to fraudulently convey funds and properties in an effort to avoid detection and the claims of WaMu, and the FDIC as receiver, for the losses resulting from the scheme,” the complaint states.

“As a result of the scheme, WaMu purchased sham mortgage loans and suffered many millions of dollars in losses. WaMu purchased these loans in justifiable reliance on false representations and fraudulent documentation misrepresenting that each mortgage was given by a real mortgagor and borrower who were purchasing the properties at issue, that funds in the amount of the mortgage were dispersed to such borrowers, and that the loans were secured by a validly recorded first lien position on the properties.

“In fact, the mortgages purchased by WaMu, while appearing to be genuine and fully documented, were entirely bogus. The borrowers never purchased the properties, even though each loan package contained a signed deed purportedly conveying the property to the borrower. No funds were ever disbursed to the borrowers, even though each loan package contained a signed mortgage, closing statement and other HUD documents, signed by the straw borrower and identifying Cusack as settlement agent and attorney, stating that such disbursements of funds had been made. Titles to the properties were never conveyed or recorded, even though each loan package contained documents indicating that recordation had occurred. No real appraisals were prepared, even though each loan package contained a purported appraisal. No title insurance was ever procured, even though each loan package contained documents stating that such insurance had been or would be paid for and issued (including statements on official forms signed by title agents and title insurers).” (Parentheses in complaint).

The FDIC claims that Clear View and Doumazios, acting as agents for United General Title, “knowingly prepared and issued falsified title reports, title insurance commitments and certificates, and title insurance policies that they knew would be used to market the mortgages and to defraud WaMu into purchasing these fake loans.”

United General Title, a New York insurance underwriting company, provided Clear View with apparently legitimate policy and commitment documents to create the impression that the mortgages were genuine.

Moreover, the defendants assured WaMu that all mortgages had validly recorded deeds and insurance titles, according to the complaint.

“Instead, as a result of the fraudulent scheme, no such title insurance was secured, no mortgages were recorded, and WaMu was induced to purchase worthless and fictitious loans resulting in millions of dollars in losses,” the complaint states. “As detailed below, Doumazios has pled guilty to criminal charges of conspiring with Kontogiannis and others to commit bank and wire fraud against WaMu, using defendant Clear View in furtherance of that conspiracy.”

The FDIC adds: “As part of the closing of the mortgages on the properties, Doumazios and Clear View were required to ensure, among other things, that monies for title insurance premiums and real estate taxes were collected and paid, legitimate commitments for title insurance and title insurance policies were issued, and deeds and mortgages were properly executed and recorded. They did none of those things. Instead, acting with apparent authority to bind UGT, they issued fraudulent policies and commitments, failed to file the deeds and mortgages, and steered monies not to the fictitious purchasers and mortgagors, but instead to Thomas Kontogiannis or his controlled entities.”

Cusack, the closing attorney, also participated in the scheme by signing fraudulent closing forms, falsely reflecting title insurance, tax and insurance payments, and recording fees for each mortgage loan, the FDIC claims.

“The concerted efforts of the participants in the scheme, including defendants, created the appearance of a real mortgage, protected by title insurance and the recording of a first lien position on the subject property, in order to induce justifiable reliance by WaMu on the bona fides of the transaction,” according to the complaint. “The fraudulent mortgages were created by the participants in the scheme, with the intent to sell them promptly, and, in fact, the sham mortgages were sold to WaMu within days of the purported ‘closings,’” the FDIC added.

To facilitate the fraud, the bogus mortgages were buried among hundreds of valid mortgages that WaMu bought from the defendants and their co-conspirators over several years, according to the complaint.

The FDIC says WaMu, which sold most of the fraudulent mortgages to Fannie Mae, was forced to repurchase them when the fraud was discovered, and suffered huge losses.

WaMu said it learned about the scheme in 2007 as Kontogiannis was facing charges of laundering bribes to a U.S. congressman – a crime for which the 62-year-old is currently serving eight years in prison.

The FDIC seeks to recover more than $1.2 million that WaMu lost in buying the fraudulent loans, as well as compensatory and punitive damages for fraud.

It is represented by Alan Gallanty with Kantor, Davidoff, Wolfe, Mandelker, Twomey & Gallanty of Manhattan.

The FDIC sold Washington Mutual to JPMorgan Chase shortly after the takeover. WaMu’s closure and receivership in 2008 is considered the largest bank failure in American financial history.


and Reuters.

Doumazios pleaded guilty last year in federal court to wire fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud. While operating a title company, Clear View Abstract, he allegedly provided Kontogiannis with documentation showing that the real estate developer had clear title on properties when in fact he did not, as Doumazios knew.

Kontogiannis, was sentenced to nine years on the same charges earlier this month. The two men worked with others to perpetrate a scam that involved not only obtaining mortgages fraudulently from Washington Mutual and DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc. but selling those mortgages to secondary buyers at the financial institutions, Reuters reports.

Doumazios, the title company, closing attorney Thomas Cusack III and another corporate defendant are currently facing a related civil suit filed by the FDIC in federal court in Brooklyn. Kontogiannis is not a defendant in that suit.

It alleges that the lenders issued mortgages on properties based on a complete fiction—that straw buyers were the actual purchasers, that the properties had actually been conveyed to them, that funds had been disbursed as reflected on closing documents and that the mortgages were secured by a first-position lien and title insurance.

“In fact,” the suit (PDF posted by Courthouse News) says, “the mortgages purchased by WaMu, while appearing to be genuine and fully documented, were entirely bogus. The borrowers never purchased the properties, even though each loan package contained a signed deed purportedly conveying the property to the borrower. No funds were ever disbursed to the borrowers, even though each loan package contained a signed mortgage, closing statement and other HUD documents, signed by the straw borrower and identifying Cusack as settlement agent and attorney, stating that such disbursements of funds had been made. Titles to the properties were never conveyed or recorded,” the complaint continues, “even though each loan package contained documents indicating that recordation had occurred. No real appraisals were prepared, even though each loan package contained a purported appraisal. No title insurance was ever procured, even though each loan package contained documents stating that such insurance had been or would be paid for and issued (including statements on official forms signed by title agents and title insurers).”

The articles don’t include any comment from the defendants or their lawyers. A phone message left by an ABA Journal reporter this afternoon at a phone number listed for Cusack did not receive an immediate response. A number listed for Doumazios on several online legal directories was not in service.

Doumazios, who earned his law degree from Hofstra University, was admitted in 1993. He did not contest his disbarment, Reuters reports.

A June 2009 press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York provides additional details.

A sole practitioner who worked as in-house counsel for companies controlled by a New York real estate developer has lost his law license for four years, because he failed to detect and stop mortgage-origination fraud by the developer that cost lenders $98 million.

There is no evidence that Thomas Cusack knew of criminal activity and he didn’t make any money from the scam, Reuters reports:

New York lawyer suspended for failing to stop mortgage fraud

NEW YORK, May 16 (Reuters) – A New York lawyer has received a four-year suspension for failing to detect and stop what a federal judge has called “one of the largest mortgage-origination frauds on record.”

The Appellate Division, Second Department, on Tuesday sustained 10 charges of professional misconduct against Thomas Cusack. Cusack is a solo practitioner who worked as in-house counsel for companies affiliated with Thomas Kontogiannis, a New York real-estate developer.

Kontogiannis pleaded guilty in October 2010 to conspiring to commit bank and wire fraud in a scheme to sell fraudulent mortgages to secondary buyers at several banks, including Washington Mutual and DLJ Mortgage Capital, a subsidiary of Credit Suisse AG.

In all, the scheme cost lenders $98 million, prosecutors said.

According to the disciplinary ruling, Cusack, acting as an attorney for companies controlled by Kontogiannis in mortgage-loan closings, failed to take proper steps to document and record the sales. That allowed Kontogiannis to later take out additional mortgages on the properties, the ruling said.

Cusack often caved under the influence of his client, improperly sharing legal fees and misusing funds in escrow accounts, the ruling stated.

There was no indication that Cusack knew that his clients engaged in criminal activity, nor did he profit from the scam, the ruling said. However, Cusack was neither candid about the circumstances surrounding the depletion of funds in his escrow account, nor willing to accept responsibility for his failure to perform usual and customary functions of a lender’s attorney, the ruling stated. “The evidence of his malfeasance is overwhelming.”

Cusack declined to comment on the decision. Edwin Mulhern, an attorney representing Cusack in the disciplinary proceedings, said his client was “duped” by Kontogiannis.

“He really didn’t know what was going on,” Mulhern said. “Perhaps he should have, but he didn’t.”

Cusack’s four-year suspension begins on June 15 and will run until Dec. 15, 2015, the ruling stated.

Last October, Kontogiannis was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto to nine years in prison. That sentence is being served concurrently with the remainder of an eight-year sentence Kontogiannis previously received for laundering bribes for former U.S. Congressman Randy “Duke” Cunningham.

The case is In the Matter of Thomas F. Cusack III, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division: Second Department, no. 2009-05856.

For the Grievance Committee for the 10th Judicial District: Mitchell Borkowsky.

For Cusack: Edwin Mulhern.

(Reporting by Jessica Dye)

However, “the evidence of his malfeasance is overwhelming” concerning his failure to perform standard lender’s attorney functions, wrote the New York Supreme Court’s Appellate Division, Second Department, in a Tuesday opinion sustaining 10 professional misconduct charges against Cusack.

Cusack’s lawyer said he was “duped” by developer Thomas Kontogiannis, who pleaded guilty in 2010 to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.

An earlier ABAJournal.com post provides additional details:

Lawyer Who Is Also a Rabbi Takes Plea in Mortgage-Fraud Case, Will Give Up Practice for 1 Year

After beating the rap in an earlier trial, a Connecticut lawyer has taken a plea in a mortgage-fraud case.

Rabbi David Avigdor, 58, pleaded guilty this week to making a false statement on to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development concerning a real estate closing, the New Haven Register reports:

Attorney Admits Role in FHA Fraud Scheme – David Avigdor pleads guilty to making false mortgage statement to HUD

A New Haven, Conn., lawyer pleaded guilty Tuesday to making a false statement to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in connection with a real estate closing, the U.S. States Attorney’s Office said today in a statement.

David Avigdor, 58, acted as the settlement agent for the sale of 211 Lloyd Street form Marshall Asmar to Alicia Martineau for a sale price of $160,000, according to court documents and statements. The mortgage on the property was insured by the Federal Housing Authority Administration, an agency within HUD.

A HUD form that acted as the settlement statement for the transaction stated that the cash due to the seller was $144,763.42, and Avigdor signed the form certifying that it was a true account of the transaction. He also signed saying “I have caused or will cause the funds to be disbursed in accordance with this settlement.”

According to the State’s Attorney’s Office, Avigdor did not disburse the $144,763.42 to the seller like he said he did on the form, but rather disbursed $93,000 to the seller and $49,375 to Sheda Telle Construction, a fake construction company, according to instructions by Morris Olmer.

Avigdor admitted in court he made the statements on the HUD form with disregard of whether the statements were true or false, and with an intent to deprive the FHA information. He said he was unaware Sheda Tell Construction was fictitious, but admits there were red flags about the transaction.

According to U.S. States Attorney’s Office, Olmer and Asmar were convicted by a jury of, among other things, conspiring to defraud the FHA and wire fraud at a trial in April 2011 at which two other individuals, Rab Nawaz and Wendy Werner, were also convicted.

The jury could not reach a verdict on any counts against Avigdor.

A sixth defendant, former real estate appraiser Thomas Gallagher, pleaded guilty during the trial. Eight other individuals involved in the scheme pleaded guilty prior to the commencement of that trial.

The leader of the conspiracy, Syed Babar, was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Nawaz was sentenced to 90 months’ in prison, Olmer and Gallagher were each sentenced to 60 months, Asmar was sentenced to 52 months, and Werner was sentenced to 48 months in prison. A former mortgage broker, Nathan Russo, was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment. The others convicted, including Alicia Martineau, who acted as a “straw” or nominee buyer for 211 Lloyd Street, have not yet been sentenced.

According to U.S. States Attorney’s Office, Avigdor faces a maximum term of imprisonment of one year and a $100,000 fine. As part of the plea agreement, he agreed to surrender his law license for one year, and agreed that if he is employed by a lawyer or performs work in a law office in the future, he will not perform or engage in any work representing buyers or banks in real estate closings. He also agreed to make a $20,000 payment toward restitution before sentencing, which is scheduled for June 29.

While acting as the settlement agent in the transaction, he incorrectly reported how the funds were disbursed, the prosecution said.

He faces a maximum sentence of one year and a $100,000 fine. Avigdor also agreed to pay $20,000 toward restitution prior to sentencing, to surrender his law license for a year and to refrain from doing real estate closings if he returns to practice.

Ex-Lawyer and Lawmaker Gets 5 Years for Handling Closings for Mortgage Fraud Ring

A former state representative and attorney in Connecticut who lost his law license years ago was sentenced this week to five years in federal prison for his role in a mortgage fraud ring.

Morris Olmer, 83, handled closings as a notary for the group. It allegedly included 14 co-conspirators who obtained $10 million in mortgage loans for residential property through a scheme that prosecutors said relied on fraudulent sales contracts, loan applications and property appraisals. The group even had a paper company that was paid to renovate homes without doing any work, according to the Capitol Watch blog of the Hartford Courant:

Former State Rep Among the Notables Caught in Mortgage Fraud Ring

An 83-year old former state representative, who lost his law license years ago for misconduct, was sentenced to 5 years in prison Monday for handling closings for a group of conspirators who concocted phony real estate deals in order to swindle more than $4.4 million from banks.

Morris Olmer, a Democrat who represented New Haven in 1967 and ’69 and a former member of New Haven’s Board of Alderman, was convicted by a jury in April of conspiring to defraud the government, eight counts of fraud involving money transfers and four counts of making false statement to investigators.

Federal prosecutors said Olmer was one of a 14 conspirators who obtained $10 million in residential real estate loans through “sham sales contracts, false loan applications and fraudulent property appraisals.” The conspirators are accused of dividing nearly half the money among themselves.

Olmer and three other members of the ring were convicted by a jury earlier this year. Seven others pleaded guilty to a variety of fraud-related charges, including the man prosecutors call the leader of the ring, Syed Babar, 28, of New London. Babar agreed to cooperate with authorities and became the government’s star witness.

The jury deadlocked on a verdict against a 14th alleged member, Rabbi David Avigdor, 57, who presides over New Haven’s Congregation Bikur Cholim Sheveth. Avigdor, a lawyer, worked for worked for Olmer, who maintained a law office in New Haven after his license to practice was revoked following a fraud complaint about four years ago. Prosecutors have said they will retry Avigdor

Another conspirator, 68-year old Thomas Gallagher of West Haven – former grand marshal of the New Haven St. Patrick’s Day parade and a member of the West Haven police commission – plead guilty to a charge of making a false statement midway through the trial. In return, prosecutors dropped more than a dozen other charges against him. He was given a five year sentence.

Gallagher was accused of manufacturing appraisals that inflated the value of the dilapidated homes the conspirators financed and transferred among themselves in distressed areas of New Haven, New London and other locations, mostly in eastern Connecticut.

Federal prosecutors said Babar arranged for straw buyers to finance and buy – at inflated prices – homes they had no intention of living in or paying for. When the deals closed, the conspirators split the loan amounts in excess of sale prices and walked away from about 30 properties, creating more blight in already struggling neighborhoods.

The conspirators created a paper contraction company called Sheda Telle Construction to launder money and justify home prices by with false claims of renovation work. Prosecutors said about $1 million in cash flowed into the company’s bank account, without any work ever being done.

Prosecutors said the ring operated between 2006 and 2010.

Five conspirators. Including Olmer, have received prison sentences of from four to 7 1/2 years in prison, Syed and seven others await sentencing. Babar is scheduled to be sentenced in November 28.

Another claimed co-conspirator, Rabbi David Avigdor, 57, who is also an attorney, was not initially convicted. He is, however, expected to be retried.

2 NY Lawyers Convicted in $25M Mortgage-Fraud Case

Two New York lawyers have each been convicted of 10 felony counts and acquitted of one felony count in what federal prosecutors described as a $25 million mortgage-fraud scheme.

Aaron Rabinowitz and Matthew Burstein, both 40, could get a maximum of 30 years when they are sentenced in November.

However, a lawyer representing Aaron Rabinowitz said his client and Burstein were only doing their jobs, reports Reuters:

2 Lawyers Convicted in Massive Mortgage-Fraud Case

NEW YORK, July 27 (Reuters) – Two New York lawyers were convicted Thursday of participating in a massive mortgage-fraud scheme that bilked $25 million from financial institutions and wholesale mortgage lenders, federal prosecutors said.

Aaron Rabinowitz and Matthew Burstein, both aged 40, were each found guilty on 10 felony charges, including conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.

The charges followed a nearly two-week trial before U.S. District Judge Allyne Ross, according to a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District.

Rabinowitz and Burstein of Queens were each acquitted on one count of bank fraud.

The two lawyers were among six individuals charged in 2011 in connection with the long-running scheme.

According to the indictment, the defendants obtained millions of dollars in mortgage loans from major banks and lenders by submitting false information on loan applications to make “straw buyers” appear creditworthy. They also misled lenders about how much money was disbursed at property closings.

From 2001 until July 2010, defendants raked in commissions and fees from the mortgages. When the straw buyers stopped making payments, they defaulted on the loans, costing lenders millions, the indictment said.

Burstein and Rabinowitz represented buyers and mortgage lenders in transactions involving the mortgaged properties, prosecutors said.

“The defendants violated the trust placed in them as attorneys and further damaged the integrity of the real estate market,” U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch said in a statement.

Both men are planning to file post-trial motions for a new trial, according to a letter filed with the court Friday.

“There was a massive mortgage fraud conspiracy where people made a lot of money, and these two defendants were not a part of the conspiracy,” said Roger Stavis, an attorney representing Rabinowitz. “They were only lawyers doing legal work and getting paid reasonable legal fees.”

Burstein and Rabinowitz each face up to 30 years in prison when they are sentenced on Nov. 26.

The other defendants in the case have pleaded guilty.

The case is U.S. v. Roldan et al., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 10-623.

For the U.S.: Matthew Amatruda, Alexander Solomon, Evan Weitz and Robert Polemeni.

For Burstein: Gregory Cooper.

For Rabinowitz: Roger Stavis, Adam Felsenstein and Pamela Gallagher of Gallet Dreyer & Berkey.

(Reporting by Jessica Dye)

 

The two plan to file post-trial motions seeking a new trial in the Eastern District of New York case.

“There was a massive mortgage fraud conspiracy where people made a lot of money, and these two defendants were not a part of the conspiracy,” Roger Stavis told the news agency. “They were only lawyers doing legal work and getting paid reasonable legal fees.”

An indictment alleged that the two defendant lawyers participated in a scheme that bilked financial institutions of $25 million by persuading them to provide mortgages to uncreditworthy straw buyers with the help of falsified loan applications and misleading the lenders about how money was being disbursed at closings. Between 2001 and 2010, prosecutors say, the defendants earned commissions and fees from the claimed scheme, but the buyers eventually defaulted, costing lenders millions.

The other defendants pleaded guilty.

Closing Lawyer Gets 7 Years in $431K Mortgage Fraud; His Counsel Says He Earned Only His Legal Fee

A 46-year-old New Jersey real estate lawyer has been sentenced to a seven-year prison term and ordered to pay a $150,000 fine and $42,404 restitution for his role in a multidefendant mortgage fraud case.

Paul DiGiacomo pleaded guilty in May in Morristown Superior Court to second-degree money-laundering of stolen funds through his trust account, the Madison Eagle reports.

Apologizing the the court at sentencing on Thursday, DiGiacomo blamed the bad economy and his need to support his family, and noted that he is likely to be disbarred. His counsel, Vincent Basile, argued for a five-year term and questioned the amount of the fine, pointing out that DiGiacomo didn’t instigate the scheme and saying that he had profited only through his legal fee. (The amount isn’t give in the article.)

However, the judge said others hit hard by the downturn in the real estate market hadn’t turned to crime and reduced by only one year the eight-year term and $150,000 fine sought by the prosecution.

press release from the state attorney general’s office describes a complex scheme in which six individuals—including a mortgage broker, real estate agent and title company employees—worked together to arrange a short assignment of the $477,000 mortgage on a home in Newark whose owner had fallen behind on payments.

With DiGiacomo’s alleged help in negotiating with the holder of the mortgage, the group arranged a $220,000 short assignment of the $477,000 mortgage to a bogus property management company it controlled, the press release recounts. Meanwhile, the group arranged a purported “sale” of the same property to a dead man at an inflated price of $539,000.

It then applied for a $431,200 mortgage loan from another lender on the purported $539,000 sale, which was supported by a dossier of faked documents showing claimed bank and employment records for the dead buyer. Falsified closing documents purported to show that the original $477,000 mortgage had been paid in full at closing.

A live person posed as the “buyer” at the closing of the $431,200 mortgage. The seller’s purported signature was forged, and she was never told of the closing.

After paying off the $220,000 owed to the mortgage holder on the short assignment at the closing of the $431,200 mortgage, DiGiacomo reportedly wired the balance remaining at the conclusion of the transaction to a bank account controlled by two defendants.

“Home sales typically involve various professionals, including real estate agents, attorneys, title agents and mortgage brokers, who are responsible for providing multiple layers of review and oversight to prevent fraud,” said Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa. “In this case, however, we had dishonest operators in every one of those roles, leading the unsuspecting lender to provide a $431,200 mortgage loan to a dead man. We will continue to work diligently to uncover such mortgage fraud schemes and send those responsible to prison.”

Five Plead Guilty in Scheme to Defraud Lender of $431,200; False Mortgage Loan Application Results in Loan Issued to Dead Man – Leader of scheme faces up to 10 years in state prison

TRENTON – Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa announced that five people have pleaded guilty for their roles in a scheme, led by a Hudson County woman, to defraud a mortgage lender of $431,200 by filing a false loan application and purchasing a home in Newark in the name of a man who was deceased. The final defendant, a Morris County lawyer, pleaded guilty today.

The leader of the scheme, Genilza R. Nunes, 38, of Kearny (aka Leticia Wilchez, Geny Silva, Gena Nunez and Genilza Borges), pleaded guilty on May 8 to second-degree money laundering before Superior Court Judge Salem Vincent Ahto in Morris County. Under the plea agreement, the state will recommend that she be sentenced to 10 years in state prison, including two years of parole ineligibility, and be ordered to pay a $150,000 fine.

Today, Paul DiGiacomo, 46, of Madison, a lawyer who laundered stolen funds through his trust account, pleaded guilty to second-degree money laundering before Superior Court Judge Thomas V. Manahan in Morris County. Under his plea agreement, the state will recommend that he be sentenced to eight years in state prison and be ordered to pay a $150,000 fine.

“Home sales typically involve various professionals, including real estate agents, attorneys, title agents and mortgage brokers, who are responsible for providing multiple layers of review and oversight to prevent fraud,” said Attorney General Chiesa. “In this case, however, we had dishonest operators in every one of those roles, leading the unsuspecting lender to provide a $431,200 mortgage loan to a dead man. We will continue to work diligently to uncover such mortgage fraud schemes and send those responsible to prison.”

“In this troubled economy, we’re working hard to stop those who engage in financial fraud,” said Stephen J. Taylor, Director of the Division of Criminal Justice. “We’ve made it a priority to investigate and prosecute major white collar crimes, including complex mortgage fraud and money laundering cases.”

Three other defendants pleaded guilty during the past two weeks:

Lillian Veras, 40, of Kearny, (aka Lillian Urena) pleaded guilty on May 14 before Judge Manahan to second-degree money laundering. Veras, a real estate agent and notary, helped prepare false loan documents for the scheme and forged signatures. She faces a recommended sentence of seven years in prison and a $150,000 fine.
Maureen R. Stillwell, 50, of Somerville, an employee of Ideal Title Agency, LLC, who helped prepare false closing documents, pleaded guilty before Judge Ahto on May 8 to second-degree money laundering. She faces a sentence of up to seven years in prison and a $25,000 fine.
Sheila Zullo, 46, of Green Brook, the owner of Ideal Title Agency, LLC, pleaded guilty on May 7 before Judge Manahan to third-degree money laundering. She admitted that she illegally distributed the loan funds as escrow agent. She faces a recommended sentence of up to three years in prison and a $150,000 fine.
A sixth defendant, Nuno J. Sousa, 37, of Union City, agreed to be charged by accusation with third-degree securities fraud and was admitted by the court into the Pre-Trial Intervention Program in April. All six defendants who have pleaded guilty or entered PTI are required to pay restitution to the lender, Provident Funding Associates, equal to one-sixth of the $431,200 loan amount, or approximately $71,867 each.

Deputy Attorney General Marysol Rosero took the guilty pleas for the Division of Criminal Justice Financial & Computer Crimes Bureau. Detective Sgt. Louis A. Matirko and DAG Rosero conducted the investigation and were assisted by Deputy Attorney General Michael Rappa, Special Agent Tanya Chavez, Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Special Agent Robert Manchak, Office of Inspector General, Federal Housing Finance Agency, and Division of Criminal Justice Interns Andrew Davenport, Brittany Kieran and Cara Ogulin.

Nunes is scheduled to be sentenced on June 29. Her co-defendants are scheduled to be sentenced as follows: DiGiacomo on July 6; Veras on June 22; Stillwell on June 29; and Zullo on June 29.

Nunes, the mastermind of the scheme, acted as a principal of Leska Management, a bogus real estate management company. With Veras’ assistance, she arranged for the purchase of a home in Newark from a woman who had fallen behind in her mortgage payments. The seller owed $477,196 on her loan, but the holder of the mortgage, Kondaur Capital Corp., agreed to a “short sale” for $260,000 to a purported buyer identified by the defendants. A “short sale” is a pre-foreclosure sale where the mortgage holder agrees to permit the home to be sold for less than the amount due on the loan.

That sale was never completed. DiGiacomo, who held himself out as the attorney for both the buyer and Leska, told Kondaur the sale had fallen through. He then negotiated with Kondaur to assign the mortgage to Leska at a discounted price of $219,877. He never disclosed that, prior to assignment of the mortgage, the home was sold at an inflated price of $539,000 to a fictitious buyer created by the defendants. Nunes, with assistance from Sousa, a mortgage broker, fraudulently applied to Provident Funding Associates for a $431,200 mortgage loan and purchased the home using the identity of a deceased man whose last name was “Benazi.” Nunes created counterfeit bank records, employment records and false identification documents for Benazi for the loan application, and she had another man pose as Benazi at the closing. No payments were ever made to the lender on the loan. The seller was never notified of the closing, and her signature was forged on the closing documents.

Stillwell handled the closing for Ideal Title and assisted in the creation of false closing documents used to deceive the lender. She never collected monies due at closing from the buyer, and falsified HUD settlement statements to indicate that they had been collected and that the prior mortgage had been paid off. In her role as escrow agent, Zullo, the owner of Ideal Title, misappropriated loan proceeds by wiring $376,032 to DiGiacomo’s attorney trust account at Nunes’ direction. DiGiacomo used $219,877 of the misappropriated funds to pay for the assignment of the mortgage and wired the balance of $156,155, representing the net illegal profits, into a bank account controlled by Nunes and Veras. Stillwell, Zullo and DiGiacomo were all compensated for their participation in the scheme.

2 Florida Attorneys Take Plea in Federal Mortgage Fraud Case

Two lawyers from Orange County, Fla., have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud charges in a federal mortgage fraud case in Orlando.

Court documents say Daniel Hoskins, 42, and Alexander Zouzoulas, 56, worked for the Nate Hoskins firm, which had exclusive closing rights at three condominium projects, reports Central Florida News 13. They face up to five years in prison when they are sentenced.

The case involved a claimed conspiracy among multiple individuals involved in the projects to inflate sales prices of units and sell them to “straw buyers” who falsely said they intended to occupy the condos as their primary homes. Kickbacks were then allegedly paid after closing to purchasers and real estate agents.

“Both Hoskins and Zouzoulas allowed closings to occur on multiple condominium purchases, using a single straw buyer that reflected that the condominiums would be the buyer’s ‘primary residence,’ even though Hoskins and Zouzoulas knew or should have known this was false,” says a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida:

Orlando Attorneys Plead Guilty In Mortgage Fraud Scheme

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 4, 2012

Orlando – Daniel Nathan Hoskins (42, Orlando) and Alexander Zouzoulas (56, Winter Park) have both pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.  Hoskins, who is suspended from practicing law, pleaded guilty today and Zouzoulas pleaded guilty on August 17, 2012.  Both men face maximum penalties of five years in federal prison.

According to court documents, from March 2006 through October 2008, Hoskins and Zouzoulas were licensed to practice law in the state of Florida.  Both men worked at Nate Hoskins, P.A. (NHPA), which had exclusive rights to conduct  residential real estate closings for three local condominium conversion projects. Hoskins and Zouzoulas conspired with individuals involved in the development of the three condominium conversion projects, to artificially inflate the sales prices of the condominium units through the use of nominee purchasers.  Nominee purchasers, also known as “straw buyers,”  obtained home loans on condominium units they had no intention of inhabiting.  They were usually paid a sum of money for the use of their identities and credit scores.  The straw buyers signed all of the documents required to purchase the condominium units, including forms falsely stating that the units would be their primary residences.

In furtherance of the  scheme, numerous straw purchasers and realtors received cash back, or “kick-backs,” after the condominium units were sold.  The illegal payments were disguised as “decorator’s allowances” or other miscellaneous charges on the closing statements. NHPA paid a 25% monthly fee to a co-conspirator involved with the development of the three condominium conversion projects for all of the closings done for units in the three developments.  These payments were not disclosed on closing statements.

Both Hoskins and Zouzoulas allowed closings to occur on multiple condominium purchases, using a single straw buyer that reflected that the condominiums would be the buyer’s “primary residence,” even though Hoskins and Zouzoulas knew or should have known this was false.  Both men scheduled closings on multiple condominium purchases by the same straw buyer in such a way to conceal from lenders the fact that the straw buyer had purchased multiple condominium units.  Hoskins and Zouzoulas also allowed payments to be made to shell companies that were established so that realtors could receive illegal kickbacks for participating in the scheme.  Neither disclosed, to lenders, the existence of the kickbacks or the disguised payments to straw buyers and realtors.

This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation. It is being prosecuted by the Assistant United States Attorney Daniel W. Eckhart.

“Both men scheduled closings on multiple condominium purchases by the same straw buyer in such a way to conceal from lenders the fact that the straw buyer had purchased multiple condominium units,” the release continues. “Hoskins and Zouzoulas also allowed payments to be made to shell companies that were established so that realtors could receive illegal kickbacks for participating in the scheme. Neither disclosed, to lenders, the existence of the kickbacks or the disguised payments to straw buyers and realtors.”

Hoskins is currently suspended from practice.

The News 13 article doesn’t include any comment from the two attorneys or their counsel:

Attorneys plead guilty in mortgage fraud scheme

ORLANDO —  Two Orange County attorneys have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.

Forty-two-year old Daniel Hoskins, who is suspended from practicing law, pleaded guilty Sept. 4. Meanwhile, 56-year-old Alexander Zouzoulas from Winter Park pleaded guilty on Aug. 17.

According to court documents, the two men worked at Nate Hoskins, P.A. (NHPA), which had exclusive rights to real estate closings for three condominium conversion projects.

Hoskins and Zouzoulas conspired with people involved in the projects to artificially inflate the sales prices of units through the use of nominee purchasers or “straw buyers.”

The purchasers were paid money to use their identities and credit scores, and then signed documents falsely stating the units would be their primary residences.

Also numerous purchasers and relators were given kickbacks after the units were sold.

Hoskins and Zouzoulas face a maximum of five years in federal prison.

Teary Attorney Who Cooperated with Feds and Tried to Atone for Mortgage Fraud Gets Substantially Reduced 2.5 Years in Jail from Judge Kenneth Marra

Attorney Carol Asbury hoped to avoid prison for her role in a multi-million-dollar South Florida mortgage fraud, she told the ABA Journal last month.

Once she came to her senses and realized she had gotten seriously off track, she went to the feds and told them what she knew, helping them make a case against others, the 59-year-old said.

She also founded the Save My Home Law Group and worked to help homeowners facing foreclosure and paid $40,000 to sponsor the 4closurefraud.com blog, which helped expose the mortgage lender robo-signing scandal, reports the Palm Beach Post.

But that and the teary apology she made in court today wasn’t enough to negate what she did, a federal judge said as he sentenced her to two and a half years in prison in what was described by the newspaper as a $2.5 million mortgage fraud.

“In my judgment, when you commit a multi-million-dollar fraud even in an otherwise law-abiding life, you can’t just say ‘I’m sorry’ and everything is forgiven,” said U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. He gave Asbury a substantial reduction in the six-and-a-half-year term she could have gotten, due to her cooperation.

She pleaded guilty in September to conspiracies to commit money-laundering and mail and wire fraud.

The problem was, Asbury’s work as a title attorney helped others turn portions of the upscale Versailles development in Wellington into what the Post called a scavenger’s paradise as straw buyers defaulted on the mortgages used to purchase homes at inflated prices and squatters moved in. At one point, fraud was allegedly involved in the mortgages for half of the development’s 450 homes, although Asbury is not accused of responsibility for more than a fraction of the bad mortgages.

She and her husband said she was dealing with significant problems at home during the eight months in 2006 that she helped others defraud lenders by submitting fraudulent paperwork for mortgages that they didn’t qualify for. Asbury also told the ABA Journal last month that she relied too much on the work of non-attorneys rather than delving into real estate matters herself.

But, countered prosecutor Stephanie Evans, “This is not, ‘I did a couple of bad transactions.’ This is, ‘I engaged in criminal conduct over many, many months. I made lots of money and I helped others make millions.’ “

The Palm Beach Post article says Asbury has agreed to be disbarred. However, it appears from a Florida Bar directory that she is still currently in good standing and has not yet lost her license to practice law.

‘God-fearing’ former lawyer will serve 2 1/2 years in prison for Versailles mortgage scam

 — A former Lake Worth lawyer described as a God-fearing, church-going woman who merely made some bad decisions while dealing with personal strife, will serve 2 1/2 years in prison for her role in a $2.5 million mortgage scam that turned parts of Wellington’s tony Versailles community into a squatter’s paradise.

Surrounded by about 15 supporters, a teary-eyed Carol Asbury, 59, accepted hugs from well-wishers today after U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra squashed her hopes of avoiding prison but gave her a break on a possible 6 1/2-year sentence because she helped bring down others involved in the scheme.

“In my judgment, when you commit a multi-million-dollar fraud even in an otherwise law-abiding life, you can’t just say I’m sorry and everything is forgiven,” he said.

He was referring to the tearful apology Asbury made to Marra, her friends, family and the law profession for fabricating loan documents to make lenders believe homes were worth far more than they actually were. Using straw buyers, she and others obtained inflated loans for homes in Versailles and then pocketed the difference between the loan amount and a home’s actual price. She admitted to her actions in September, pleading guilty to conspiracy to commit money-laundering and conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud.

“For eight months of my life I made bad decisions. Please don’t let it define my life,” Asbury told Marra.

Her husband of 22 years, Wayne Asbury, echoed his wife’s pleas. “Carol has always been a giver, not a taker,” he said. During 2006, when she made “poor decisions,” she was dealing with his looming brain surgery, her live-in mother-in-law’s failing health and a high-school-age daughter who needed her help, he said.

Her attorney, Christopher Lyons, said Asbury has tried to atone. She founded Save My Home Law Group to help homeowners facing foreclosure. She spent $40,000 to sponsor a popular blog, 4closurefraud.com. It is partly credited for exposing the robo-signing scandal that pushed banks to temporarily freeze home repossessions. She also agreed to be disbarred.

However, federal prosecutor Stephanie Evans said that despite Asbury’s apparent remorse, she was key to the scam. “This is not, “I did a couple of bad transactions,’ ” Evans said. “This is, ‘I engaged in criminal conduct over many, many months. I made lots of money and I helped others make millions.’ ”

Her phony loan documents prompted others to pay far more for homes in Versailles than they homes were worth, Evans said. At one point, fraud was involved in about half of the mortages written in the 450-home community off U.S. 441. Unable to pay the steep mortages, people eventually defaulted and moved out. “Gang-bangers” and other squatters moved in, she said. The community is just now rebounding.

In all, about two dozen people were charged in connection with the scheme. Asbury is to report to prison on Jan. 6.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, HOUSTON DIVISION

 

Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-04543

 

 

 

Joanna Burke and John Burke

 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

 

Hopkins Law, PLLC, Mark Daniel Hopkins and Shelley Luan Hopkins,

 

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiffs Joanna & John Burke (“Plaintiffs”) reply to Hopkins as follows;

“A judge who receives information clearly establishing that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct should take appropriate action…” and “A judge having knowledge that a lawyer had committed a violation of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness1 as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Texas or take other appropriate action.”2

Hopkins summary responses are shown below along with Burkes reply, which also addresses the reasons why the above cases and citations are very important in deciding the pending motion[s], addressing the violations; the dishonest and unlawful acts of the lawyers proceeding pro se before it, and this case in general;

1  See Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238, 246-47, 64 S.CT. 997, 1001-02, 88 L.ED. 1250 (1944) (attorney tampering with administration of justice requires vacation of judgment, whether or not behavior actually influenced outcome of trial); id. at 251, 64 S.Ct. lawyer in other respects shall inform the Office of the General Counsel of the State Bar of Texas or take other appropriate action.” 1003 (Roberts, J., dissenting) (“No fraud is more odious than an attempt to subvert the administration of justice.“); Great Coastal Express, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers of America, 675 F.2D 1349, 1357 (4th Cir. 1982) (“Involvement of an attorney, as an officer of the court, in a scheme to suborn perjury would certainly be considered fraud on the court.“), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1128, 103 S.Ct. 764, 74 L.Ed.2d 978 (1983); H.K. Porter Co. v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co., 536 F.2D 1115, 1119 (6th Cir. 1976) (“Since attorneys are officers of the court, their conduct, if dishonest, would constitute fraud on the court.“); 7 MOORE’S FEDERAL PRACTICE § 60.33, at 359 (2d ed. 1985) (Attorney’s loyalty to client “obviously does not demand that he act dishonestly or fraudulently; on the contrary his loyalty to the court, as an officer thereof, demands integrity and honest dealing with the court. And when he departs from that standard in the conduct of a case he perpetrates a fraud upon the court.“) – Synanon Foundation, Inc. v. Bernstein, 503 A.2d 1254, 1263 (D.C. 1986).

Hopkins: The Dodd-Frank Act and FDCPA has no bearing or effect on this matter.”

Firstly, there is the jurisdictional question; “The Court today holds that this Court and the federal courts below must refrain from exercising their jurisdiction to decide this lawsuit properly brought. It remands the case to the Court of Appeals and implies that a state court should be the one to determine two questions of state law to avoid a federal constitutional question which is also presented.” – Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, 363 U.S. 207, 213 (1960).

The Burkes argued [and not for the first time] that the State Court is the correct and only domain that should hear this lawsuit but remand was denied and also in the case of Ocwen, now on appeal. “It would be a temerarious man who described the constitutional question decided below as frivolous.” – Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, 363 U.S. 207, 213 (1960). This is cemented by the above US Supreme Court case. It also makes Hopkins arguments moot. The question itself is answered in (c) below.

2 Rule 3.03(a)(1) (prohibiting lawyers from “knowingly making false statements of material fact or law to a tribunal”), Rule 3.03(a)(5) (prohibiting lawyers from knowingly offering false evidence), Rule 8.04(a)(3) (prohibiting lawyers from “engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation”). – See Case #18-0879, Supreme Court of Texas, 25th October, 2019, COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE v. MARK A. CANTU

Hopkins: “The Burkes name calling (“Rogue Debt Collector”) and allegations regarding the status of Hopkins Law, PLLC and its attorneys simply have no foundation in the law.”

Unbonded debt collecting law firm[s] in Texas (with no surety bond as required by the State of Texas) e.g. Hopkins Law, PLLC, would fall squarely into this citation:

“In In re Lenahan, Gardin v. Lenahan, et al. 05-70108 MJK another “edge” was addressed. Rogue attorneys violated the FDCPA in attempting to collect their client’s debts. This Court ruled that damages arising from the willful and malicious conduct of the attorney/debtors were non-dischargeable in their bankruptcy case.” In re Greason, Case No. 07-00357K, AP No. 07-1077 K, at *15 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Mar. 10, 2009).

Hopkins:“The First Amended Complaint [Doc. 27] does not contest the constitutionality of the FDCPA, nor does it dispute the validity of Texas Finance Code §392. And “the court may reject the constitutional challenge…”.

Hopkins is dishonest. See Doc 27, footnote 1 and Doc. 28, p.15-19 [‘Hopkins Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint’] wherein Hopkins responds; “…because they failed to post bond required by Tex. Fin. Code §392.101.” [“TDCA or TFC”]. Both reference Constitutional challenges. Hopkins exhausts from #28-37 of their motion defending and citing the FDCPA, TDCA and/or TFC discussing the Constitutional Challenge[s]. Secondly, per the docket this court has not issued the Constitutional Challenge letters to the AGs, they remain dormant. This, despite the fact the State of Texas and the unconstitutional CFPB has been on notice3 by the Burkes about the TFC Surety Bond question[s] and yet they have failed to answer the Burkes formal requests, and prior to the Constitutional challenge[s] raised here.

This case turns on the decision of Burke v. Ocwen, 5th Circuit;

The Burkes have and still argue Hopkins does not have authority to act for Ocwen4. Hopkins filed a reply to the Burkes Motion to Stay at the 5th Circuit Ocwen Case on Friday, 25th October. The Burkes replied on Monday via a Supplemental Pleading (with Exhibits) [and which this court can take judicial notice]. As stated in the appeal and which is relevant here; Hopkins’ 5th Circuit filing was more about themselves and alarmingly [if you’re the client] conflicts with Ocwens’ own stance in the Florida litigation with CFPB that “an Act” [Dodd-Frank] which is unconstitutional is “not a law” and their case should be dismissed, with prejudice. As such, Hopkins claims that the Ocwen Florida case is “irrelevant” to this case is farcical and absurd.

Hopkins: “The Burkes non-related intervention case somehow relates to this suit against its adversary’s [pro se] attorneys; And; The eleventh circuit case (the Burkes intervention in an appeal between Ocwen and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) involves no matters at issue in this case.”

First, see prior answers and generally, why the Ocwen/CFPB lawsuit is extremely relevant. Secondly, Hopkins filed an unauthorized Supplemental Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay [Doc. 14] wherein at p.2 they include EXHIBIT A, the CFPB v. Ocwen Florida case which they ‘judicially noticed’ this court and rely upon for their Motion to Dismiss. Absurdly, Hopkins now claim it is ‘non-related’ when they claim to be attorneys for Ocwen in the cases #4543 and #4544 before this court and/or on appeal.

3 See Supplemental Pleading and Exhibit Exhibit-Hopkins-TFC-Texas-Gov in the 5th appeal and Doc. 27, footnote 1 (as an example).

4 July 2019; Ocwen was issued ANOTHER cease and desist consent order from the STATE OF MAINE; ORDER, in part; “The Bureau finds that OLS had no authority to execute documents as an Attorney in Factfor legal entities which have had no corporate existence [similar to the case of Deutsche Bank v. Burke case before this court [correct decision(s) aligning with Maine] and the 5th Circuit [#15-20201 and 18-20026] incorrectly reversing this court and based on a fraud upon the court appeal filed by dishonest Hopkins] since March 13, 2012 at the latest and that OLS’s uses of those documents constitute violations of 32 M.R.S. § 11013(2).” See https://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/index.php?topic=PFR-combined- press&id=1415353&v=article2019

The Ditech Bankruptcy. Hopkins: “A ruling by Judge Sim Lake in regard to a Ditech matter is just simply irrelevant.”

In re Ditech Holding Corp., Case No. 19-10412 (JLG) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y., 2019) Doc. 15, P. 423 of 1003 shows Hopkins Law, PLLC on the ‘List of Creditors’. This confirms (i) Hopkins holds a financial interest in Ditech rulings in this court and the Bankruptcy (ii) Hopkins Law, PLLC is for the first time in this case, confirmed as an attorney representing a known non-bank servicer, and or sub-servicer (“mortgage servicer”) (seeking payment of services) and casts further darkness over their claims per their Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 6] and repeated in Doc. 28, the Second Motion to Dismiss by Hopkins wherein they state they “act as counsel for those entities (“Deutsche” and “Ocwen”) in the litigation, appeals and all subsequent litigation…” Hopkins go on to provide a list of all ‘related’ cases.

The PSAs contractual agreements do not support Hopkins representing Ocwen and Deutsche at the same time without (i) a conflict of interest and (ii) providing this court the necessary proof they are (a) legally retained and (b) have yet to show authority in any and all of the lawsuits past and present, in this court by these corporations and despite the frequent disposals and purchases of MSRs over the years which the Burkes allege would prove the Burkes arguments that Hopkins and/or their ‘client[s]’ do not have legal authority.

The Burkes arguments are further solidified by the case in Maine, wherein Ocwen was issued a ‘cease and desist’ for the exact same reason as Magistrate Judge Smith ruled for the Burkes in this court in the Deutsche case, twice.

It is further confirmation that the Burkes have more than met their legal burden to ensure that Hopkins Second Motion to Dismiss is denied as the Burkes pleadings meet the standard to proceed to discovery and a jury trial.

Hopkins: The Burkes Believe the Stay will Provide Due Process

That is correct. “In Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950), this Court recognized that prior to an action which will affect an interest in life, liberty, or property protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, a State must provide “notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.”” – Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791, 795 (1983). – See OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC V. GONZALEZ FINANCIAL HOLDINGS CIVIL ACTION NO. H-13-2441, S.D. Tex., Doc. 42, holding when Due Process is raised in pleadings, it applies (affirmed by 5th Circuit #15-20176 for Deutsche and Ocwen).

Hopkins: This Court is biased against the Burkes

Hopkins perpetrated his first fraud on the court in the appeal in the Deutsche case.5 This system of fraud on the court was repeated in Howard v. PNC. Both are well documented and before this court. Hopkins also incites the court with lies and untruthful testimony as this court has personally witnessed and uses legalese and mischief to attack the Burkes integrity, calling them “vexatious litigants” who are filing a “baseless” lawsuit and are “personally attacking” Hopkins and the case should be dismissed “with prejudice” and so on. Hopkins deception, repetitive dishonest testimony and fraud on the court (“the System”) should be rejected by this court AND their violations reported.

5 This is also often referred to as falsification [of evidence] in courts. “It is well-established that falsification of [company] documents is a legitimate reason for termination [of Hopkins unlawful appeal in Deutsche v. Burke #15-20201]. See, Kiel v. Select Artificials, Inc., 169 F.3D 1131, 1135 (8th Cir. 1999); Ward v. Procter Gamble Paper Prods. Co., 111 F.3D 558, 560 (8th Cir. 1997); Price v. S-B Power Tool, 75 F.3D 362, 364 (8th Cir. 1996).” – Sornsen v. Wackenhut Corporation, 01-CV-1967(JMR/FLN), at *1 (D. Minn. Feb. 27, 2003).

Conclusion: 

On  Friday, the  States’  highest court  reminded  the  circuit in length and in particularity, addressing “federal judges” (who are also lawyers) in Texas of their Oath and legal obligations in reporting attorneys before them, who act in bad faith, malice, dishonesty and lack of integrity and trustworthiness.

See the Supreme Court of Texas case of COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE v. MARK A. CANTU. The Burkes now ask the court to fulfill that obligation in this matter, so that due process and justice may be served. The Burkes motion[s] should be granted along with any and all other relief this court may provide.

RESPECTFULLY submitted this 29th day of October, 2019.

The “Justice” Department and their ‘BFF’s’ keep deleting LIT’s links so where possible, we find and repost them. These are a couple of posts deleted from the above article.

Nine Indicted In $92 Million Mortgage Fraud Scheme

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 04, 2009

A federal grand jury in Brooklyn returned an indictment charging nine defendants with a mortgage fraud scheme that resulted in losses exceeding $90 million. The indictment alleges the defendants conspired to defraud Washington Mutual Bank (“WAMU”) and DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. (“DLJ”), a subsidiary of Credit Suisse, in connection with the development of two tracts of land located in Brooklyn and Queens by staging the sales of the same properties to straw buyers in order to obtain multiple mortgages on those properties. Thomas Kontogiannis, John Michael, Elias Apergis, Steven Martini, Nadia Konstantinadou, Stefan Deligiannis, Ted Doumazios, Edward Hogan, and Jonathan Rubin are charged with conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud. In addition, Kontogiannis, Apergis, Konstantinadou, Deligiannis, Martini, and Doumazios are charged with bank fraud, and Kontogiannis and Konstantinadou are charged with money laundering and money laundering conspiracy.1

The indictment was announced by Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Joseph M. Demarest, Jr., Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office, Richard H. Neiman, New York Superintendent of Banks, and Jon T. Rymer, Inspector General, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The defendants’ initial appearances and arraignments are scheduled later today before United States Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann, at the U. S. Courthouse, 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York. The case has been assigned to United States District Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto.

As detailed in the indictment, from 2001 to 2003, Kontogiannis, a real estate developer, purchased and subdivided Loring Estates, located in East New York, Brooklyn, and Edgewater Development, located in College Point, Queens. Hogan and Rubin served as the architect and engineer, respectively, and were employed by Kontogiannis. Together, the three defendants obtained permits to construct multi-unit housing at Loring Estates and Edgewater Development.

To finance the projects, the defendants allegedly subdivided the tracts and staged sales of the properties financed by mortgage loans. The defendants prepared false loan files to create the appearance that the properties were being purchased by creditworthy homeowners, when, in fact, Kontogiannis recruited straw buyers from among family members and employees of companies he controlled, including the defendants Deligiannis, Hogan, Rubin, and Apergis. The indictment charges that Martini furnished fraudulent appraisals to support the price of the properties, even where the buildings had yet to be built or had fictional addresses; and Doumazios provided fraudulent title abstract reports and other documentation designed to indicate that the seller, a Kontogiannis-controlled entity, had clear title to convey and that the lender’s interest was protected by title insurance. The loans were financed by lenders controlled by Kontogiannis, including Interamerican Mortgage Corp., later known as CIP Mortgage Corp., (collectively, “Interamerican/CIP”) and Coastal Capital Corp. (“Coastal”), which was run by Kontogiannis’ nephew, John Michael. Stefan Deligiannis allegedly processed the fraudulent loans, which were subsequently sold to WAMU and DLJ.

As part of the fraud scheme, in an attempt to conceal the multiple sales of the same properties, Kontogiannis allegedly changed the addresses of properties located in East New York, Brooklyn, to addresses in neighboring Howard Beach, Queens. In addition, the indictment charges that Kontogiannis and Konstantinadou caused entities controlled by Kontogiannis to make monthly payments on the mortgages, ensuring that none of the mortgages became delinquent. However, the payments ceased in 2007, with approximately $92 million in principal outstanding on the fraudulent mortgages.

“Last year, we announced the formation of a task force comprised of federal, state, and local law-enforcement agents and investigators to address the burgeoning problem of mortgage fraud,” stated United States Attorney Campbell. “This case is another example of the results of our ongoing efforts, which include investigations and prosecutions of mortgage fraud schemes that harmed investors, lenders, and homeowners throughout the country.” Mr. Campbell expressed his grateful appreciation to the New York State Banking Department for its assistance.

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Demarest stated, “The indictment sets forth a soup-to-nuts mortgage fraud scheme that included false loan files containing phony information, fraudulent appraisals, fictional addresses, fake title reports, and phantom title insurance. This resulted in the defrauding of two financial institutions out of more than $90 million. The mortgage fraud task force was constituted to root out such operations, and it has been doing just that.”

New York Superintendent of Banks Neiman stated, “Our Criminal Investigations Bureau’s Mortgage Fraud Unit has done an outstanding job in identifying this fraud and developing the initial investigation. The results of our collaborative efforts should serve as a strong warning to individuals that participate in these large organized mortgage fraud rings that you will be caught and brought to justice.”

FDIC Inspector General Rymer stated, “The FDIC OIG is committed to its partnerships with others in the law enforcement community as we address mortgage fraud cases throughout the country. Now, more than ever, the American people need to be assured that their government is working to ensure integrity in the financial services and housing industries and that those involved in criminal activities that undermine that integrity will be held accountable.”

The maximum term of imprisonment for any defendant convicted of conspiracy to commit bank fraud is 30 years. The indictment also seeks forfeiture of the proceeds of the defendants’ bank and wire fraud activity and of property involved in money laundering, including a criminal forfeiture money judgment and money traceable to four commercial properties controlled by Kontogiannis worth at least $50 million.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jonathan E. Green and Duncan Levin.

The Defendants:

THOMAS KONTOGIANNIS
Age: 60

JOHN MICHAEL
Age: 38

ELIAS APERGIS
Age: 32

STEVEN MARTINI
Age: 56

NADIA KONSTANTINADOU
Age: 45

STEFAN DELIGIANNIS
Age: 35

TED DOUMAZIOS
Age: 40

EDWARD HOGAN
Age: 60

JONATHAN RUBIN
Age: 43

_____________________________

1 The charges announced today are merely allegations, and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 15, 2010

PRESS RELEASE

 

LEADER OF $92 MILLION MORTGAGE FRAUD CONSPIRACY PLEADS GUILTY

 

Thomas Kontogiannis, a New York real estate developer who led a mortgage fraud conspiracy resulting in more than $90 million losses, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud in federal court in Brooklyn today. Kontogiannis admitted defrauding Washington Mutual Bank (“WAMU”) and DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. (“DLJ”), a subsidiary of Credit Suisse, in connection with his development of two tracts of land in Brooklyn and Queens. The proceedings were held before United States District Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto.

The guilty plea was announced by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Janice K. Fedarcyk, Assistant Director-in-Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office, Richard H. Neiman, New York Superintendent of Banks, and Jon T. Rymer, Inspector General, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The indictment alleges that from 2001 to 2003, Kontogiannis purchased and subdivided Loring Estates, located in East New York, Brooklyn, and Edgewater Development, located in College Point, Queens. After the conspirators obtained permits to construct multi-unit housing, Kontogiannis staged sales of the properties financed by mortgage loans. He then directed others to prepare false loan files to create the appearance that the properties were being purchased by creditworthy homeowners, when, in fact, Kontogiannis sold the properties to family members and employees who acted as straw buyers. The mortgages were supported by fraudulent appraisals depicting finished homes when the buildings had yet to be built or had fictional addresses, and the mortgage files contained fraudulent title abstract reports and other documentation designed to indicate that the seller, a Kontogiannis-controlled entity, had clear title to convey and that the lender’s interest was protected by title insurance. The loans were financed by lenders controlled by Kontogiannis, including Interamerican Mortgage Corp., later known as CIP Mortgage Corp. and Coastal Capital Corp. After the loans were closed, Kontogiannis ensured that the mortgages and deeds were not recorded, thereby permitting him to “sell” the same property repeatedly. Kontogiannis eventually sold the loans to WAMU or DLJ.

In an effort to conceal the multiple sales of the same properties, Kontogiannis changed the addresses of properties located in East New York, Brooklyn, to addresses in neighboring Howard Beach, Queens. In addition, he directed others to make monthly payments on the mortgages, ensuring that none of the mortgages became delinquent. The payments ceased in 2007, with approximately $92 million in principal outstanding on the fraudulent mortgages.

Kontogiannis, along with eight other defendants, were indicted on conspiracy and bank and wire fraud charges in June 2009. Four other defendants have pleaded guilty to date.

“The scope of this fraud is staggering,” stated United States Attorney Lynch. “The defendant controlled every aspect of the mortgage lending process, right up to the sale of fraudulent loans into the secondary market.” Ms. Lynch expressed her grateful appreciation to the New York State Banking Department for its assistance.

FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge Fedarcyk stated, “Kontogiannis has added another conviction to his rap sheet by defrauding banks and others in his ninety-two million dollar mortgage fraud scheme. He thought he had the system figured out and now faces adding even more time to his sentence. This guilty plea is a step towards cleaning up the housing market, and the FBI will continue to vigorously investigate those that perpetrate this type of crime which affects all Americans.”

New York Superintendent of Banks Neiman stated, “This plea of guilty to one of the largest mortgage frauds directed by a single individual was made possible by seamless coordination between federal agencies and the state banking department. This degree of cooperative federalism, with each agency contributing specialized expertise, will restore confidence in the mortgage sector and the greater financial system.”

FDIC Inspector General Rymer stated, “The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Office of Inspector General (FDIC-OIG) is pleased to join the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York and our law enforcement colleagues in announcing this guilty plea. The American people need to be assured that their government is working to ensure integrity in the financial services and housing industries and that individuals and entities involved in mortgage fraud criminal misconduct will be prosecuted. Bringing these individuals to justice helps maintain the safety and soundness of the nation’s financial institutions.”

Kontogiannis faces up to 30 years’ imprisonment on the conspiracy count to which he pleaded guilty. Kontogiannis also consented to forfeiture of the proceeds of his fraudulent activity, including a criminal forfeiture money judgment and money traceable to four commercial properties he controlled worth at least $50 million.

The government’s case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Jonathan E. Green and Duncan Levin.

This law enforcement action is part of President Barack Obama’s Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. President Obama established the interagency Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to wage an aggressive, coordinated, and proactive effort to investigate and prosecute financial crimes. The task force includes representatives from a broad range of federal agencies, regulatory authorities, inspectors general, and state and local law enforcement who, working together, bring to bear a powerful array of criminal and civil enforcement resources. The task force is working to improve efforts across the federal executive branch, and with state and local partners, to investigate and prosecute significant financial crimes, ensure just and effective punishment for those who perpetrate financial crimes, combat discrimination in the lending and financial markets, and recover proceeds for victims of financial crimes. More information about the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force can be found at www.stopfraud.gov.

The Defendant:

THOMAS KONTOGIANNIS
Age: 61

Former State Rep Among the Notables Caught in Mortgage Fraud Ring

An 83-year old former state representative, who lost his law license years ago for misconduct, was sentenced to 5 years in prison Monday for handling closings for a group of conspirators who concocted phony real estate deals in order to swindle more than $4.4 million from banks.

Morris Olmer, a Democrat who represented New Haven in 1967 and ’69 and a former member of New Haven’s Board of Alderman, was convicted by a jury in April of conspiring to defraud the government, eight counts of fraud involving money transfers and four counts of making false statement to investigators.

Federal prosecutors said Olmer was one of a 14 conspirators who obtained $10 million in residential real estate loans through “sham sales contracts, false loan applications and fraudulent property appraisals.” The conspirators are accused of dividing nearly half the money among themselves.

Olmer and three other members of the ring were convicted by a jury earlier this year. Seven others pleaded guilty to a variety of fraud-related charges, including the man prosecutors call the leader of the ring, Syed Babar, 28, of New London. Babar agreed to cooperate with authorities and became the government’s star witness.

The jury deadlocked on a verdict against a 14th alleged member, Rabbi David Avigdor, 57, who presides over New Haven’s Congregation Bikur Cholim Sheveth. Avigdor, a lawyer, worked for worked for Olmer, who maintained a law office in New Haven after his license to practice was revoked following a fraud complaint about four years ago. Prosecutors have said they will retry Avigdor

Another conspirator, 68-year old Thomas Gallagher of West Haven – former grand marshal of the New Haven St. Patrick’s Day parade and a member of the West Haven police commission – plead guilty to a charge of making a false statement midway through the trial. In return, prosecutors dropped more than a dozen other charges against him. He was given a five year sentence.

Gallagher was accused of manufacturing appraisals that inflated the value of the dilapidated homes the conspirators financed and transferred among themselves in distressed areas of New Haven, New London and other locations, mostly in eastern Connecticut.

Federal prosecutors said Babar arranged for straw buyers to finance and buy – at inflated prices – homes they had no intention of living in or paying for. When the deals closed, the conspirators split the loan amounts in excess of sale prices and walked away from about 30 properties, creating more blight in already struggling neighborhoods.

The conspirators created a paper contraction company called Sheda Telle Construction to launder money and justify home prices by with false claims of renovation work. Prosecutors said about $1 million in cash flowed into the company’s bank account, without any work ever being done.

Prosecutors said the ring operated between 2006 and 2010.

Five conspirators. Including Olmer, have received prison sentences of from four to 7 1/2 years in prison, Syed and seven others await sentencing. Babar is scheduled to be sentenced in November 28.

Mortgage Servicer PHH Ocwen: Scammin’ Homeowners Since 2008, with Government and Judicial Approval

The mortgage servicing industry constantly refuses, misallocates or has some other reason for not crediting customers mortgages with the payment to induce foreclosure.

A Message for Felon Francis Santa: We Cannot Be Bribed. Stop the Harassment

Once a person has been convicted of a felony, he or she can be considered a felon for life, according to the strict meaning of the word.

August 2022 List of Thievin’ and Lyin’ Attorneys In the State of Florida

The consistent theme for August 2022, and indeed most months, is Florida lawyers theft of client funds and settlement funds.

Acceleration

Rewind 2008: The Home Snatchers Stole Millions of Homes, Lives and Citizen’s Trust By Unimaginable Fraud

Wall Street and the Government decided, if they were to make it through the Greatest Depression, they’d have to spin their biggest lie in the history of the United States of America. It worked.

Published

on

Invasion of the Home Snatchers

How foreclosure courts are helping big banks screw over homeowners

NOV 10, 2010 | REPUBLISHED BY LIT: DEC 4, 2021

The foreclosure lawyers down in Jacksonville had warned me, but I was skeptical. They told me the state of Florida had created a special super-high-speed housing court with a specific mandate to rubber-stamp the legally dicey foreclosures by corporate mortgage pushers like Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan Chase.

This “rocket docket,” as it is called in town, is presided over by retired judges who seem to have no clue about the insanely complex financial instruments they are ruling on — securitized mortgages and laby­rinthine derivative deals of a type that didn’t even exist when most of them were active members of the bench.

Their stated mission isn’t to decide right and wrong, but to clear cases and blast human beings out of their homes with ultimate velocity. They certainly have no incentive to penetrate the profound criminal mysteries of the great American mortgage bubble of the 2000s, perhaps the most complex Ponzi scheme in human history — an epic mountain range of corporate fraud in which Wall Street megabanks conspired first to collect huge numbers of subprime mortgages, then to unload them on unsuspecting third parties like pensions, trade unions and insurance companies (and, ultimately, you and me, as taxpayers) in the guise of AAA-rated investments.

Selling lead as gold, shit as Chanel No. 5, was the essence of the booming international fraud scheme that created most all of these now-failing home mortgages.

Looting Main Street

The rocket docket wasn’t created to investigate any of that. It exists to launder the crime and bury the evidence by speeding thousands of fraudulent and predatory loans to the ends of their life cycles, so that the houses attached to them can be sold again with clean paperwork.

The judges, in fact, openly admit that their primary mission is not justice but speed.

One Jacksonville judge, the Honorable A.C. Soud, even told a local newspaper that his goal is to resolve 25 cases per hour.

Given the way the system is rigged, that means His Honor could well be throwing one ass on the street every 2.4 minutes.

Foreclosure lawyers told me one other thing about the rocket docket. The hearings, they said, aren’t exactly public.

“The judges might give you a hard time about watching,” one lawyer warned. “They’re not exactly anxious for people to know about this stuff.”

Inwardly, I laughed at this — it sounded like typical activist paranoia. The notion that a judge would try to prevent any citizen, much less a member of the media, from watching an open civil hearing sounded ridiculous.

Fucked-up as everyone knows the state of Florida is, it couldn’t be that bad. It isn’t Indonesia. Right?

Well, not quite.

When I went to sit in on Judge Soud’s courtroom in downtown Jacksonville, I was treated to an intimate, and at times breathtaking, education in the horror of the foreclosure crisis, which is rapidly emerging as the even scarier sequel to the financial meltdown of 2008:

Invasion of the Home Snatchers II.

In Las Vegas, one in 25 homes is now in foreclosure.

In Fort Myers, Florida, one in 35.

In September, lenders nationwide took over a rec­ord 102,134 properties; that same month, more than a third of all home sales were distressed properties.

All told, some 820,000 Americans have already lost their homes this year, and another 1 million currently face foreclosure.

Throughout the mounting catastrophe, however, many Americans have been slow to comprehend the true nature of the mortgage disaster. They seemed to have grasped just two things about the crisis:

One, a lot of people are getting their houses foreclosed on.

Two, some of the banks doing the foreclosing seem to have misplaced their paperwork.

For most people, the former bit about homeowners not paying their damn bills is the important part, while the latter, about the sudden and strange inability of the world’s biggest and wealthiest banks to keep proper records, is incidental.

Just a little office sloppiness, and who cares?

Those deadbeat homeowners still owe the money, right?

“They had it coming to them,” is how a bartender at the Jacksonville airport put it to me.

But in reality, it’s the unpaid bills that are incidental and the lost paperwork that matters.

It turns out that underneath that little iceberg tip of exposed evidence lies a fraud so gigantic that it literally cannot be contemplated by our leaders, for fear of admitting that our entire financial system is corrupted to its core — with our great banks and even our government coffers backed not by real wealth but by vast landfills of deceptively generated and essentially worthless mortgage-backed assets.

You’ve heard of Too Big to Fail — the foreclosure crisis is Too Big for Fraud.

Think of the Bernie Madoff scam, only replicated tens of thousands of times over, infecting every corner of the financial universe. The underlying crime is so pervasive, we simply can’t admit to it — and so we are working feverishly to rubber-stamp the problem away, in sordid little backrooms in cities like Jacksonville, behind doors that shouldn’t be, but often are, closed.

And that’s just the economic side of the story.

The moral angle to the foreclosure crisis — and, of course, in capitalism we’re not supposed to be concerned with the moral stuff, but let’s mention it anyway — shows a culture that is slowly giving in to a futuristic nightmare ideology of computerized greed and unchecked financial violence.

The monster in the foreclosure crisis has no face and no brain.

The mortgages that are being foreclosed upon have no real owners. The lawyers bringing the cases to evict the humans have no real clients. It is complete and absolute legal and economic chaos.

No single limb of this vast man-­eating thing knows what the other is doing, which makes it nearly impossible to combat — and scary as hell to watch.

What follows is an account of a single hour of Judge A.C. Soud’s rocket docket in Jacksonville.

Like everything else related to the modern economy, these foreclosure hearings are conducted in what is essentially a foreign language, heavy on jargon and impenetrable to the casual observer.

It took days of interviews with experts before and after this hearing to make sense of this single hour of courtroom drama. And though the permutations of small-time scammery and grift in the foreclosure world are virtually endless — your average foreclosure case involves homeowners or investors being screwed at least five or six creative ways — a single hour of court and a few cases is enough to tell the main story.

Because if you see one of these scams, you see them all.

It’s early on a sunny Tuesday morning when I arrive at the chambers of Judge Soud, one of four rotating judges who preside over the local rocket docket.

These special foreclosure courts were established in July of this year, after the state of Florida budgeted $9.6 million to create a new court with a specific mandate to clear 62 percent of the foreclosure cases that were clogging up the system.

Rather than forcing active judges to hear thousands of individual cases, this strategy relies on retired judges who take turns churning through dozens of cases every morning, with little time to pay much attention to the particulars.

What passes for a foreclosure court in Jacksonville is actually a small conference room at the end of a hall on the fifth floor of the drab brick Duval County Courthouse. The space would just about fit a fridge and a pingpong table.

At the head of a modest conference table this morning sits Judge Soud, a small and fussy-looking man who reminds me vaguely of the actor Ben Gazzara.

On one side of the table sits James Kowalski, a former homicide prosecutor who is now defending homeowners.

A stern man with a shaved head and a laconic manner of speaking, Kowalski has helped pioneer a whole new approach to the housing mess, slowing down the mindless eviction machine by deposing the scores of “robo-signers” being hired by the banks to sign phony foreclosure affidavits by the thousands.

For his work on behalf of the dispossessed, Kowalski was recently profiled in a preposterous Wall Street Journal article that blamed attorneys like him for causing the foreclosure mess with their nuisance defense claims.

The headline: “Niche Lawyers Spawned Housing Fracas.”

On the other side of the table are the plaintiff’s attorneys, the guys who represent the banks.

On this level of the game, these lawyers refer to themselves as “bench warmers” — volume stand-ins subcontracted by the big, hired-killer law firms that work for the banks.

One of the bench warmers present today is Mark Kessler, who works for a number of lenders and giant “foreclosure mills,” including the one run by David J. Stern, a gazillionaire attorney and all-Universe asshole who last year tried to foreclose on 70,382 homeowners.

Which is a nice way to make a living, considering that Stern and his wife, Jeanine, have bought nearly $60 million in property for themselves in recent years, including a 9,273-square-foot manse in Fort Lauderdale that is part of a Ritz-Carlton complex.

Kessler is a harried, middle-aged man in glasses who spends the morning perpetually fighting to organize a towering stack of folders, each one representing a soon-to-be-homeless human being. It quickly becomes apparent that Kessler is barely acquainted with the names in the files, much less the details of each case.

“A lot of these guys won’t even get the folders until right before the hearing,” says Kowalski.

When I arrive, Judge Soud and the lawyers are already arguing a foreclosure case; at a break in the action, I slip into the chamber with a legal-aid attorney who’s accompanying me and sit down. The judge eyes me anxiously, then proceeds.

He clears his throat, and then it’s ready, set, fraud!

Judge Soud seems to have no clue that the files he is processing at a breakneck pace are stuffed with fraudulent claims and outright lies.

“We have not encountered any fraud yet,” he recently told a local newspaper. “If we encountered fraud, it would go to [the state attorney], I can tell you that.”

But the very first case I see in his court is riddled with fraud.

Kowalski has seen hundreds of cases like the one he’s presenting this morning.

It started back in 2006, when he went to Pennsylvania to conduct what he thought would be a routine deposition of an official at the lending giant GMAC.

What he discovered was that the official — who had sworn to having personal knowledge of the case — was, in fact, just a “robo-signer” who had signed off on the file without knowing anything about the actual homeowner or his payment history.

(Kowalski’s clients, like most of the homeowners he represents, were actually making their payments on time; in this particular case, a check had been mistakenly refused by GMAC.)

Following the evidence, Kowalski discovered what has turned out to be a systemwide collapse of the process for documenting mortgages in this country.

If you’re foreclosing on somebody’s house, you are required by law to have a collection of paperwork showing the journey of that mortgage note from the moment of issuance to the present.

You should see the originating lender (a firm like Countrywide) selling the loan to the next entity in the chain (perhaps Goldman Sachs) to the next (maybe JP Morgan), with the actual note being transferred each time.

But in fact, almost no bank currently foreclosing on homeowners has a reliable record of who owns the loan; in some cases, they have even intentionally shredded the actual mortgage notes.

That’s where the robo-signers come in.

To create the appearance of paperwork where none exists, the banks drag in these pimply entry-level types — an infamous example is GMAC’s notorious robo-signer Jeffrey Stephan, who appears online looking like an age-advanced photo of Beavis or Butt-Head — and get them to sign thousands of documents a month attesting to the banks’ proper ownership of the mortgages.

This isn’t some rare goof-up by a low-level cubicle slave: Virtually every case of foreclosure in this country involves some form of screwed-up paperwork.

“I would say it’s pretty close to 100 percent,”

says Kowalski. An attorney for Jacksonville Area Legal Aid tells me that out of the hundreds of cases she has handled, fewer than five involved no phony paperwork.

“The fraud is the norm,” she says.

Kowalski’s current case before Judge Soud is a perfect example.

The Jacksonville couple he represents are being sued for delinquent payments, but the case against them has already been dismissed once before. The first time around, the plaintiff, Bank of New York Mellon, wrote in Paragraph 8 that “plaintiff owns and holds the note” on the house belonging to the couple.

But in Paragraph 3 of the same complaint, the bank reported that the note was “lost or destroyed,” while in Paragraph 4 it attests that “plaintiff cannot reasonably obtain possession of the promissory note because its whereabouts cannot be determined.”

The bank, in other words, tried to claim on paper, in court, that it both lost the note and had it, at the same time. Moreover, it claimed that it had included a copy of the note in the file, which it did — the only problem being that the note (a) was not properly endorsed, and (b) was payable not to Bank of New York but to someone else, a company called Novastar.

Now, months after its first pass at foreclosure was dismissed, the bank has refiled the case — and what do you know, it suddenly found the note. And this time, somehow, the note has the proper stamps.

“There’s a stamp that did not appear on the note that was originally filed,” Kowalski tells the judge. (This business about the stamps is hilarious. “You can get them very cheap online,” says Chip Parker, an attorney who defends homeowners in Jacksonville.)

The bank’s new set of papers also traces ownership of the loan from the original lender, Novastar, to JP Morgan and then to Bank of New York.

The bank, in other words, is trying to push through a completely new set of documents in its attempts to foreclose on Kowalski’s clients.

There’s only one problem: The dates of the transfers are completely fucked.

According to the documents, JP Morgan transferred the mortgage to Bank of New York on December 9th, 2008. But according to the same documents, JP Morgan didn’t even receive the mortgage from Novastar until February 2nd, 2009 — two months after it had supposedly passed the note along to Bank of New York.

Such rank incompetence at doctoring legal paperwork is typical of foreclosure actions, where the fraud is laid out in ink in ways that make it impossible for anyone but an overburdened, half-asleep judge to miss.

“That’s my point about all of this,”

Kowalski tells me later.

“If you’re going to lie to me, at least lie well.”

The dates aren’t the only thing screwy about the new documents submitted by Bank of New York.

Having failed in its earlier attempt to claim that it actually had the mortgage note, the bank now tries an all-of-the-above tactic.

“Plaintiff owns and holds the note,” it claims, “or is a person entitled to enforce the note.”

Soud sighs. For Kessler, the plaintiff’s lawyer, to come before him with such sloppy documents and make this preposterous argument — that his client either is or is not the note-holder — well, that puts His Honor in a tough spot.

The entire concept is a legal absurdity, and he can’t sign off on it.

With an expression of something very like regret, the judge tells Kessler,

“I’m going to have to go ahead and accept [Kowalski’s] argument.”

Now, one might think that after a bank makes multiple attempts to push phony documents through a courtroom, a judge might be pissed off enough to simply rule against that plaintiff for good.

As I witness in court all morning, the defense never gets more than one chance to screw up. But the banks get to keep filing their foreclosures over and over again, no matter how atrocious and deceitful their paperwork is.

Thus, when Soud tells Kessler that he’s dismissing the case, he hastens to add:

“Of course, I’m not going to dismiss with prejudice.” With an emphasis on the words “of course.”

Instead, Soud gives Kessler 25 days to come up with better paperwork.

Kowalski fully expects the bank to come back with new documents telling a whole new story of the note’s ownership.

“What they’re going to do, I would predict, is produce a note and say Bank of New York is not the original note-holder, but merely the servicer,” he says.

This is the dirty secret of the rocket docket

The whole system is set up to enable lenders to commit fraud over and over again, until they figure out a way to reduce the stink enough so some judge like Soud can sign off on the scam.

“If the court finds for the defendant, the plaintiffs just refile,” says Parker, the local attorney.

“The only way for the caseload to get reduced is to give it to the plaintiff. The entire process is designed with that result in mind.”

Now all of this — the obviously cooked-up documents, the magically appearing stamp and the rest of it — may just seem like nothing more than sloppy paperwork. After all, what does it matter if the bank has lost a few forms or mixed up the dates?

The homeowners still owe what they owe, and the deadbeats have no right to keep living in a house they haven’t paid for.

But what’s going on at the Jacksonville rocket docket, and in foreclosure courts all across the country, has nothing to do with sloppiness.

All this phony paperwork was actually an essential part of the mortgage bubble, an integral element of what has enabled the nation’s biggest lenders to pass off all that subprime lead as AAA gold.

In the old days, when you took out a mortgage, it was probably through a local bank or a credit union, and whoever gave you your loan held on to it for life.

If you lost your job or got too sick to work and suddenly had trouble making your payments, you could call a human being and work things out.

It was in the banker’s interest, as well as yours, to make a modified payment schedule.

From his point of view, it was better that you pay something than nothing at all.

But that all changed about a decade ago, thanks to the invention of new financial instruments that magically turned all these mortgages into high-grade investments.

Now when you took out a mortgage, your original lender — which might well have been a big mortgage mill like Countrywide or New Century — immediately sold off your loan to big banks like Deutsche and Goldman and JP Morgan.

The banks then dumped hundreds or thousands of home loans at a time into tax-exempt real estate trusts, where the loans were diced up into securities, examined and graded by the ratings agencies, and sold off to big pension funds and other institutional suckers.

Even at this stage of the game, the banks generally knew that the loans they were buying and reselling to investors were shady.

A company called Clayton Holdings, which analyzed nearly 1 million loans being prepared for sale in 2006 and 2007 by 23 banks, found that nearly half of the mortgages failed to meet the underwriting standards being promised to investors.

Citi­group, for instance, had 29 percent of its loans come up short, but it still sold a third of those mortgages to investors.

Goldman Sachs had 19 percent of its mortgages flunk the test, yet it knowingly hawked 34 percent of the risky deals to investors.

D. Keith Johnson, the head of Clayton Holdings, was so alarmed by the findings that he went to officials at three of the main ratings agencies — Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch’s — and tried to get them to properly evaluate the loans.

“Wouldn’t this information be great for you to have as you assign risk levels?” he asked them.

(Translation: Don’t you ratings agencies want to know that half these loans are crap before you give them a thumbs-up?)

But all three agencies rejected his advice, fearing they would lose business if they adopted tougher standards. In the end, the agencies gave large chunks of these mortgage-backed securities AAA ratings — which means “credit risk almost zero.”

Since these mortgage-backed securities paid much higher returns than other AAA investments like treasury notes or corporate bonds, the banks had no trouble attracting investors, foreign and domestic, from pension funds to insurance companies to trade unions.

The demand was so great, in fact, that they often sold mortgages they didn’t even have yet, prompting big warehouse lenders like Countrywide and New Century to rush out into the world to find more warm bodies to lend to.

In their extreme haste to get thousands and thousands of mortgages they could resell to the banks, the lenders committed an astonishing variety of fraud,

from falsifying income statements to making grossly inflated appraisals to misrepresenting properties to home buyers.

Most crucially, they gave tons and tons of credit to people who probably didn’t deserve it, and why not?

These fly-by-night mortgage companies weren’t going to hold on to these loans, not even for 10 minutes.

They were issuing this credit specifically to sell the loans off to the big banks right away, in furtherance of the larger scheme to dump fraudulent AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities on investors.

If you had a pulse, they had a house to sell you.

As bad as Countrywide and all those lenders were, the banks that had sent them out to collect these crap loans were a hundred times worse.

To sell the loans, the banks often dumped them into big tax-exempt buckets called REMICs, or Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits. Each one of these Enron-ish, offshore-like real estate trusts spelled out exactly what kinds of loans were supposed to be in the pool, when they were to be collected, and how they were to be managed.

In order to both preserve their tax-exempt status and deserve their AAA ratings, each of the loans in the pool had to have certain characteristics. The loans couldn’t already be in default or foreclosure at the time they were sold to investors.

If they were advertised as nice, safe, fixed-rate mortgages, they couldn’t turn out to be high-interest junk loans. And, on the most basic level, the loans had to actually exist.

In other words, if the trust stipulated that all the loans had to be collected by August 2005, the bank couldn’t still be sticking in mortgages months later.

Yet that’s exactly what the banks did. In one case handled by Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, a homeowner refinanced her house in 2005 but almost immediately got into trouble, going into default in December of that year.

Yet somehow, this woman’s loan was placed into a trust called Home Equity Loan Trust Series AE 2005-HE5 in January 2006 — five months after the deadline for that particular trust.

The loan was not only late, it was already in foreclosure — which means that, by definition, whoever the investors were in AE 2005-HE5 were getting shafted.

Why does stuff like this matter?

Because when the banks put these pools together, they were telling their investors that they were putting their money into tidy collections of real, performing home loans.

But frequently, the loans in the trust were complete shit. Or sometimes, the banks didn’t even have all the loans they said they had. But the banks sold the securities based on these pools of mortgages as AAA-rated gold anyway.

In short, all of this was a scam — and that’s why so many of these mortgages lack a true paper trail.

Had these transfers been done legally, the actual mortgage note and detailed information about all of these transactions would have been passed from entity to entity each time the mortgage was sold.

But in actual practice, the banks were often committing securities fraud (because many of the mortgages did not match the information in the prospectuses given to investors) and tax fraud (because the way the mortgages were collected and serviced often violated the strict procedures governing such investments).

Having unloaded this diseased cargo onto their unsuspecting customers, the banks had no incentive to waste money keeping “proper” documentation of all these dubious transactions.

“You’ve already committed fraud once,” says April Charney, an attorney with Jacksonville Area Legal Aid. “What do you have to lose?”

Sitting in the rocket docket, James Kowalski considers himself lucky to have won his first motion of the morning.

To get the usually intractable Judge Soud to forestall a foreclosure is considered a real victory, and I later hear Kowalski getting props and attaboys from other foreclosure lawyers.

In a great deal of these cases, in fact, the homeowners would have a pretty good chance of beating the rap, at least temporarily, if only they had lawyers fighting for them in court.

But most of them don’t.

In fact, more than 90 percent of the cases that go through Florida foreclosure courts are unopposed.

Either homeowners don’t know they can fight their foreclosures, or they simply can’t afford an attorney.

These unopposed cases are the ones the banks know they’ll win — which is why they don’t sweat it if they take the occasional whipping.

That’s why all these colorful descriptions of cases where foreclosure lawyers like Kowalski score in court are really just that — a little color.

The meat of the foreclosure crisis is the unopposed cases; that’s where the banks make their money. They almost always win those cases, no matter what’s in the files.

This becomes evident after Kowalski leaves the room.

“Who’s next?” Judge Soud says. He turns to Mark Kessler, the counsel for the big foreclosure mills. “Mark, you still got some?”

“I’ve got about three more, Judge,” says Kessler.

Kessler then drops three greenish-brown files in front of Judge Soud, who spends no more than a minute or two glancing through each one.

Then he closes the files and puts an end to the process by putting his official stamp on each foreclosure with an authoritative finality:

Kerchunk!
Kerchunk!
Kerchunk!

Each one of those kerchunks means another family on the street.

There are no faces involved here, just beat-the-clock legal machinery.

Watching Judge Soud plow through each foreclosure reminds me of the scene in Fargo where the villain played by Swedish character actor Peter Stormare pushes his victim’s leg through a wood chipper with that trademark bored look on his face.

Mechanized misery and brainless bureaucracy on the one hand, cash for the banks on the other.

What’s sad is that most Americans who have an opinion about the foreclosure crisis don’t give a shit about all the fraud involved. They don’t care that these mortgages wouldn’t have been available in the first place if the banks hadn’t found a way to sell oregano as weed to pension funds and insurance companies.

They don’t care that the Countrywides’ of the world pushed borrowers who qualified for safer fixed-­income loans into far more dangerous adjustable-rate loans, because their brokers got bigger commissions for doing so.

They don’t care that in the rush to produce loans, people were sold houses that turned out to have flood damage or worse, and they certainly don’t care that people were sold houses with inflated appraisals, which left them almost immediately underwater once housing prices started falling.

The way the banks tell it, it doesn’t matter if they defrauded homeowners and investors and taxpayers alike to get these loans.

All that matters is that a bunch of deadbeats aren’t paying their fucking bills.

“If you didn’t pay your mortgage, you shouldn’t be in your house — period,” is how Walter Todd, portfolio manager at Greenwood Capital Associates, puts it.

“People are getting upset about something that’s just procedural.”

Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan, is even more succinct in dismissing the struggling homeowners that he and the other megabanks scammed before tossing out into the street.

“We’re not evicting people who deserve to stay in their house,” Dimon says.

There are two things wrong with this argument. (Well, more than two, actually, but let’s just stick to the two big ones.)

The first reason is: It simply isn’t true.

Many people who are being foreclosed on have actually paid their bills and followed all the instructions laid down by their banks. In some cases, a homeowner contacts the bank to say that he’s having trouble paying his bill, and the bank offers him loan modification. But the bank tells him that in order to qualify for modification, he must first be delinquent on his mortgage.

“They actually tell people to stop paying their bills for three months,” says Parker.

The authorization gets recorded in what’s known as the bank’s “contact data­base,” which records every phone call or other communication with a home­owner. But no mention of it is entered into the bank’s “number history,” which records only the payment record.

When the number history notes that the home­owner has missed three payments in a row, it has no way of knowing that the homeowner was given permission to stop making payments. “One computer generates a default letter,” says Kowalski. “Another computer contacts the credit bureaus.”

At no time is there a human being looking at the entire picture.

Which means that homeowners can be foreclosed on for all sorts of faulty reasons: misplaced checks, address errors, you name it. This inability of one limb of the foreclosure beast to know what the other limb is doing is responsible for many of the horrific stories befalling homeowners across the country.

Patti Parker, a local attorney in Jacksonville, tells of a woman whose home was seized by Deutsche Bank two days before Christmas. Months later, Deutsche came back and admitted that they had made a mistake: They had repossessed the wrong property.

In another case that made headlines in Orlando, an agent for JP Morgan mistakenly broke into a woman’s house that wasn’t even in foreclosure and tried to change the locks.

Terrified, the woman locked herself in her bathroom and called 911. But in a profound expression of the state’s reflexive willingness to side with the bad guys, the police made no arrest in the case. Breaking and entering is not a crime, apparently, when it’s authorized by a bank.

The second reason the whole they still owe the fucking money thing is bogus has to do with the changed incentives in the mortgage game.

In many cases, banks like JP Morgan are merely the servicers of all these home loans, charged with collecting your money every month and paying every penny of it into the trust, which is the real owner of your mortgage.

If you pay less than the whole amount, JP Morgan is now obligated to pay the trust the remainder out of its own pocket. When you fall behind, your bank falls behind, too. The only way it gets off the hook is if the house is foreclosed on and sold.

That’s what this foreclosure crisis is all about: fleeing the scene of the crime.

Add into the equation the fact that some of these big banks were simultaneously betting big money against these mortgages — Goldman Sachs being the prime example — and you can see that there were heavy incentives across the board to push anyone in trouble over the cliff.

Things used to be different.

Asked what percentage of struggling homeowners she used to be able to save from foreclosure in the days before securitization,

Charney is quick to answer.

“Most of them,” she says. “I seldom came across a mortgage I couldn’t work out.”

In Judge Soud’s court, I come across a shining example of this mindless rush to foreclosure when I meet Natasha Leonard, a single mother who bought a house in 2004 for $97,500.

Right after closing on the home, Leonard lost her job. But when she tried to get a modification on the loan, the bank’s offer was not helpful.

“They wanted me to pay $1,000,” she says. Which wasn’t exactly the kind of modification she was hoping for, given that her original monthly payment was $840.

“You’re paying $840, you ask for a break, and they ask you to pay $1,000?” I ask.

“Right,” she says.

Leonard now has a job and could make some kind of reduced payment. But instead of offering loan modification, the bank’s lawyers are in their fourth year of doggedly beating her brains out over minor technicalities in the foreclosure process.

That’s fine by the lawyers, who are collecting big fees.

And there appears to be no human being at the bank who’s involved enough to issue a sane decision to end the costly battle.

“If there was a real client on the other side, maybe they could work something out,” says Charney, who is representing Leonard.

In this lunatic bureaucratic jungle of securitized home loans issued by trans­national behemoths, the borrower-lender relationship can only go one of two ways: full payment, or total war.

The extreme randomness of the system is exemplified by the last case I see in the rocket docket.

While most foreclosures are unopposed, with homeowners not even bothering to show up in court to defend themselves, a few pro se defendants — people representing themselves — occasionally trickle in.

At one point during Judge Soud’s proceeding, a tallish blond woman named Shawnetta Cooper walks in with a confused look on her face.

A recent divorcee delinquent in her payments, she has come to court today fully expecting to be foreclosed on by Wells Fargo. She sits down and takes a quick look around at the lawyers who are here to kick her out of her home.

“The land has been in my family for four generations,” she tells me later. “I don’t want to be the one to lose it.”

Judge Soud pipes up and inquires if there’s a plaintiff lawyer present; someone has to lop off this woman’s head so the court can move on to the next case.

But then something unexpected happens: It turns out that Kessler is supposed to be foreclosing on her today, but he doesn’t have her folder.

The plaintiff, technically, has forgotten to show up to court.

Just minutes before, I had watched what happens when defendants don’t show up in court: kerchunk! The judge more or less automatically rules for the plaintiffs when the homeowner is a no-show.

But when the plaintiff doesn’t show, the judge is suddenly all mercy and forgiveness. Soud simply continues Cooper’s case, telling Kessler to get his shit together and come back for another whack at her in a few weeks.

Having done this, he dismisses everyone.

Stunned, Cooper wanders out of the courtroom looking like a person who has stepped up to the gallows expecting to be hanged, but has instead been handed a fruit basket and a new set of golf clubs.

I follow her out of the court, hoping to ask her about her case. But the sight of a journalist getting up to talk to a defendant in his kangaroo court clearly puts a charge into His Honor, and he immediately calls Cooper back into the conference room.

Then, to the amazement of everyone present, he issues the following speech:

“This young man,” he says, pointing at me, “is a reporter for Rolling Stone. It is your privilege to talk to him if you want.” He pauses. “It is also your privilege to not talk to him if you want.”

I stare at the judge, open-mouthed. Here’s a woman who still has to come back to this guy’s court to find out if she can keep her home, and the judge’s admonition suggests that she may run the risk of pissing him off if she talks to a reporter.

Worse, about an hour later, April Charney, the lawyer who accompanied me to court, receives an e-mail from the judge actually threatening her with contempt for bringing a stranger to his court.

Noting that “we ask that anyone other than a lawyer remain in the lobby,” Judge Soud admonishes Charney that “your unprofessional conduct and apparent authorization that the reporter could pursue a property owner immediately out of Chambers into the hallway for an interview, may very well be sited [sic] for possible contempt in the future.”

Let’s leave aside for a moment that Charney never said a word to me about speaking to Cooper.

And let’s overlook entirely the fact that the judge can’t spell the word cited.

The key here isn’t this individual judge — it’s the notion that these hearings are not and should not be entirely public. Quite clearly, foreclosure is meant to be neither seen nor heard.

After Soud’s outburst, Cooper quietly leaves the court.

Once out of sight of the judge, she shows me her file. It’s not hard to find the fraud in the case.

For starters, the assignment of mortgage is autographed by a notorious robo-signer — John Kennerty, who gave a deposition this summer admitting that he signed as many as 150 documents a day for Wells Fargo.

In Cooper’s case, the document with Kennerty’s signature on it places the date on which Wells Fargo obtained the mortgage as May 5th, 2010. The trouble is, the bank bought the loan from Wachovia — a bank that went out of business in 2008.

All of which is interesting, because in her file, it states that Wells Fargo sued Cooper for foreclosure on February 22nd, 2010.

In other words, the bank foreclosed on Cooper three months before it obtained her mortgage from a nonexistent company.

There are other types of grift and outright theft in the file.

As is typical in many foreclosure cases, Cooper is being charged by the bank for numerous attempts to serve her with papers.

But a booming industry has grown up around fraudulent process servers; companies will claim they made dozens of attempts to serve homeowners, when in fact they made just one or none at all. Who’s going to check?

The process servers cover up the crime using the same tactic as the lenders, saying they lost the original summons.

From 2000 to 2006, there was a total of 1,031 “affidavits of lost summons” here in Duval County; in the past two years, by contrast, more than 4,000 have been filed.

Cooper’s file contains a total of $371 in fees for process service, including one charge of $55 for an attempt to serve process on an “unknown tenant.”

But Cooper’s house is owner-occupied — she doesn’t even have a tenant, she tells me with a shrug.

If Mark Kessler had had his shit together in court today, Coop­er would not only be out on the street, she’d be paying for that attempt to serve papers to her nonexistent tenant.

Cooper’s case perfectly summarizes what the foreclosure crisis is all about.

Her original loan was made by Wachovia, a bank that blew itself up in 2008 speculating in the mortgage market. It was then transferred to Wells Fargo, a megabank that was handed some $50 billion in public assistance to help it acquire the corpse of Wachovia.

And who else benefited from that $50 billion in bailout money?

Billionaire Warren Buffett and his Berkshire Hathaway fund, which happens to be a major shareholder in Wells Fargo.

It was Buffett’s vice chairman, Charles Munger, who recently told America that it should “thank God” that the government bailed out banks like the one he invests in, while people who have fallen on hard times — that is, homeowners like Shawnetta Cooper — should “suck it in and cope.”

Look: It’s undeniable that many of the people facing foreclosure bear some responsibility for the crisis. Some borrowed beyond their means. Some even borrowed knowing they would never be able to pay off their debt, either hoping to flip their houses right away or taking on mortgages with low initial teaser rates without bothering to think of the future.

The culture of take-for-yourself-now, let-someone-else-pay-later wasn’t completely restricted to Wall Street. It penetrated all the way down to the individual consumer, who in some cases was a knowing accomplice in the bubble mess.

But many of these homeowners are just ordinary Joes who had no idea what they were getting into. Some were pushed into dangerous loans when they qualified for safe ones.

Others were told not to worry about future jumps in interest rates because they could just refinance down the road, or discovered that the value of their homes had been overinflated by brokers looking to pad their commissions.

And that’s not even accounting for the fact that most of this credit wouldn’t have been available in the first place without the Ponzi-like bubble scheme cooked up by Wall Street, about which the average home­owner knew nothing — hell, even the average U.S. senator didn’t know about it.

At worst, these ordinary homeowners were stupid or uninformed — while the banks that lent them the money are guilty of committing a baldfaced crime on a grand scale.

These banks robbed investors and conned homeowners, blew themselves up chasing the fraud, then begged the taxpayers to bail them out.

And bail them out we did:

We ponied up billions to help Wells Fargo buy Wachovia, paid Bank of America to buy Merrill Lynch, and watched as the Fed opened up special facilities to buy up the assets in defective mortgage trusts at inflated prices.

And after all that effort by the state to buy back these phony assets so the thieves could all stay in business and keep their bonuses, what did the banks do?

They put their foot on the foreclosure gas pedal and stepped up the effort to kick people out of their homes as fast as possible, before the world caught on to how these loans were made in the first place.

Why don’t the banks want us to see the paperwork on all these mortgages?

Because the documents represent a death sentence for them.

According to the rules of the mortgage trusts, a lender like Bank of America, which controls all the Countrywide loans, is required by law to buy back from investors every faulty loan the crooks at Countrywide ever issued.

Think about what that would do to Bank of America’s bottom line the next time you wonder why they’re trying so hard to rush these loans into someone else’s hands.

When you meet people who are losing their homes in this foreclosure crisis, they almost all have the same look of deep shame and anguish.

Nowhere else on the planet is it such a crime to be down on your luck, even if you were put there by some of the world’s richest banks, which continue to rake in record profits purely because they got a big fat handout from the government.

That’s why one banker CEO after another keeps going on TV to explain that despite their own deceptive loans and fraudulent paperwork, the real problem is these deadbeat homeowners who won’t pay their fucking bills.

And that’s why most people in this country are so ready to buy that explanation.

Because in America, it’s far more shameful to owe money than it is to steal it.

YOUR DONATION(S) WILL HELP US:

• Continue to provide this website, content, resources, community and help center for free to the many homeowners, residents, Texans and as we’ve expanded, people nationwide who need access without a paywall or subscription.

• Help us promote our campaign through marketing, pr, advertising and reaching out to government, law firms and anyone that will listen and can assist.

Thank you for your trust, belief and support in our conviction to help Floridian residents and citizens nationwide take back their freedom. Your Donations and your Voice are so important.



Deutsche Bank’s Current and Past Financial Scandals

A History of Fraud, Corruption and Support of the Nazi Regime. Now Ask Yourselves Why the US Government Support this German Bank over American Citizens?

After the war, Allied authorities determined that Deutsche Bank had not only actively supported the Nazi regime but had also maintained close ties to officials such as SS chief Heinrich Himmler and had been involved in appropriating assets of financial institutions in countries overrun by the Nazis.

LEARN MORE ABOUT DEUTSCHE BANK

Continue Reading

Acceleration

Who is Presiding Judge Andrea Gundersen, Mortgage Foreclosure Division, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit?

Judge Gundersen presides over all foreclosures in Broward County. She has been referred to JQC, asking that she be removed from the bench.

Published

on

FL Honest Lending Report

REPUBLISHED BY LIT: JUL 5, 2021

After orchestrating one of the largest consumer frauds in American history, the banking industry continues the unethical and illegal servicing and foreclosure practices that were uncovered during the “robo-signing” scandal which eventually led to the $25b settlement with 49 State Attorneys General in 2012.

While some of the unethical practices regarding origination were curbed after the settlement, unethical servicing and fraudulent foreclosures continue to plague homeowners.

Floridians for Honest Lending (FHL) reviewed several hundred foreclosure complaints filed in 2019 by Bank of America, the Bank of New York Mellon, and JP Morgan Chase in the Eleventh and Seventeenth Judicial Circuit Courts that comprise Miami-Dade and Broward counties respectively. Upon that review, FHL found 369 foreclosure complaints were filed with rubber-stamped blank endorsements with signatures of David SpectorLaurie MederMichele Sjolander, and Cynthia Riley, whose names became synonymous with the robo-signing scandal. Of those, 325 were loans originated by Countrywide, the disgraced mortgage company that was bought by Bank of America in 2008.

In addition, FHL found that in Miami-Dade alone, 310 homes had been sold at auction since January 2019 that included these same rubber-stamped blank endorsements from these same rubber-stamped blank endorsements, 21 of which were sold during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The fraudulent rubber-stamped blank endorsements are used to establish standing and the banks’ right to foreclose on homeowners, the same homeowners that were sold predatory loans and pushed into foreclosure with unethical servicing practices.

This practice of filing false documents was documented by 60 Minutes in 2011 and was part of the complaint filed by the 49 State Attorneys General.

It was discovered after the $25b National Mortgage Settlement that Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase continued to submit forged documents, now relying on forgery and perjury, in foreclosures across the nation.

Unfortunately, the banks’ reckless greed left millions of properties with mortgages and promissory notes corrupted and the chain of title on those properties broken, putting trial court judges in an uncomfortable position of either taking the banking industry to task for these forged documents or kicking a family out of their home.

Unfortunately, with little scrutiny from the media, legislators, or regulators, our court system has heavily favored the latter.

In fact, FHL’s review found that in Broward county, 217 of the 219 foreclosure complaints filed in 2019 that included fraudulent rubber stamps were assigned to Judge Andrea Gundersen.

Of these cases assigned to Judge Gundersen, 126 of them have been closed, none of which were ruled in favor of the defendant.

Currently, Judge Gundersen presides over all foreclosures in Broward County.

She was reassigned from Family Court and does not have prior experience in foreclosure litigation.

Since her reassignment, defense attorneys have filed motions for judicial disqualification against Judge Gundersen for allowing attorneys for Bank of America to misrepresent the law and argue that “fraud on the court” is allowed in foreclosure because of a “litigation privilege” and ordering the defendant to pay the Bank’s attorney’s fees for challenging the fraud.

In April 2021, Judge Gundersen granted nineteen motions for disqualification in cases she presided over.

The clients have referred Judge Gundersen to the Judicial Qualifications Commission asking that she be removed from the bench.

These fraudulent foreclosures impact real people like Ana Rodriguez, an 82-year-old homeowner who was a former Cuban political prisoner, who now faces eviction because she was sold a predatory loan by Countrywide.

It impacts people like Mrs. Marie Williams-James who never missed a mortgage payment but Bank of America foreclosed on her anyway and Mr. and Mrs. Simpson who were working on a mortgage modification when the Judge refused the bank’s motion for continuance and forced the Simpsons into a fraudulent foreclosure judgment.

There is a new foreclosure crisis looming due to the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. As we get the pandemic under control, the federal government will be under increased pressure from the banking industry to lift the FHFA moratorium for federally-backed mortgages from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

That moratorium only protects borrowers who had strong enough credit scores to qualify for government-backed mortgages. The elderly, communities of color, and first-time homebuyers who took subprime mortgages are not protected by any moratorium and are still being evicted during the pandemic.

The issue of fraudulent foreclosures must be resolved before this new crisis begins. This is an issue that demands action at the local, state, and federal levels from legislators, regulators, and our judicial system.

We cannot continue to allow fraud in our justice system for the convenience of the banking industry and at the expense of homeowners’ American Dream.

Floridian for Honest Lending is a project of Opportunity For All Floridians, a 501c4 non-profit organization. We believe that our system will only work with transparency, honesty, and accountability. Our research can be found here.

Each complaint filed by the banks’ attorneys is linked in the second column. The forged rubber stamps can usually be found on the promissory notes that are included in the exhibits.

Below you can also find a sample of the varied David Spector signatures.

YOUR DONATION(S) WILL HELP US:

• Continue to provide this website, content, resources, community and help center for free to the many homeowners, residents, Texans and as we’ve expanded, people nationwide who need access without a paywall or subscription.

• Help us promote our campaign through marketing, pr, advertising and reaching out to government, law firms and anyone that will listen and can assist.

Thank you for your trust, belief and support in our conviction to help Floridian residents and citizens nationwide take back their freedom. Your Donations and your Voice are so important.



Continue Reading

Acceleration

Panic: The Untold Story of the 2008 Financial Crisis

Ultimately, the people – the homeowners – over 10 million – would be sacrificed and not a single Wall St. Banker went to jail.

Published

on

VICE on HBO looks at factors that led to the 2008 financial crisis and the efforts made by then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, Federal Reserve Bank of New York President Timothy Geithner, and Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke to save the United States from an economic collapse.

The feature-length documentary explores the challenges these men faced, as well as the consequences of their decisions. 

Ultimately, the people – the homeowners – over 10 million – would be sacrificed and not a single Wall St. Banker went to jail.

“It’s not based on any particular data point, we just wanted to choose a really large number.”

— a Treasury Department spokeswoman explaining how the $700 billion number was chosen for the initial bailout.

Continue Reading

Most Read

Copyright © 2020-2024 LawsInFlorida.com is an online brand name which is wholly owned by Blogger Inc., a nonprofit 501(c)(3) registered in Delaware | Caricatures by DonkeyHotey